Q
QuestionBusiness Law

What advantage does a "Nolo contendere" (no contest) plea have over a guilty plea? A. It may not be used later as a basis for a civil proceeding seeking monetary damages. B. The defendant will have a reduced sentence. C. The charges will not show up on the defendant's criminal record. D. It delays the sentencing process.
10 months agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1:
: Understand the options and their consequences.

When a defendant in a criminal case pleads "nolo contendere" (no contest), they are not admitting guilt but are still allowing the court to find them guilty and impose a sentence. This is different from a guilty plea, where the defendant explicitly admits to committing the crime.

Step 2:
: Analyze the statement regarding the advantages of a "nolo contendere" plea.

Option A: It may not be used later as a basis for a civil proceeding seeking monetary damages.

Step 3:
: Examine the first advantage.

In some jurisdictions, a "nolo contendere" plea cannot be used as evidence in a subsequent civil trial to prove the defendant's liability. This means that if someone is sued in a civil court for damages related to the same incident, the plaintiff cannot use the criminal court's finding of guilt based on the "nolo contendere" plea against the defendant.

Step 4:
: Evaluate the remaining options.

Options B, C, and D are not accurate descriptions of the advantages of a "nolo contendere" plea. A "nolo contendere" plea does not guarantee a reduced sentence (Option B), nor does it prevent the charges from appearing on the defendant's criminal record (Option C). Additionally, it does not necessarily delay the sentencing process (Option D).

Final Answer

The primary advantage of a "nolo contendere" plea over a guilty plea is that it may not be used later as a basis for a civil proceeding seeking monetary damages (Option A).