Which of the following is a valid criticism of classical criminology? A. It relies too much on empirical evidence B. It ignores the role of societal factors in crime C. It promotes rehabilitation over punishment D. None of the above
10 months agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1:
I'll solve this problem step by step, focusing on the key aspects of classical criminology.

Step 2:
: Understand Classical Criminology

Classical criminology is a theoretical approach to understanding crime developed in the 18th century by philosophers like Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham. Its key principles include: - Rational choice theory - Punishment as a deterrent - Emphasis on free will - Belief that individuals make conscious decisions about criminal behavior

Step 3:
: Analyze Each Option

Option A: "It relies too much on empirical evidence" - This is NOT a valid criticism - Classical criminology actually LACKS extensive empirical evidence - The theory is more philosophical and based on rational reasoning Option B: "It ignores the role of societal factors in crime" - This IS a valid criticism - Classical criminology focuses on individual rational choice - It minimizes the impact of social, economic, and environmental influences on criminal behavior - Later theories like social learning theory and strain theory would address these limitations Option C: "It promotes rehabilitation over punishment" - This is INCORRECT - Classical criminology emphasizes punishment as a deterrent - The primary goal is to create a rational system of punishment to discourage crime - Rehabilitation was not a primary focus of this approach Option D: "None of the above" - This is false, as Option B is a valid criticism

Step 4:
: Conclusion

The correct answer is B. Classical criminology ignores the role of societal factors in crime.

Final Answer

B