Skip to content
Textbook Guides

Solution Manual For Cost Accounting: Managerial Emphasis with MyAccountingLab, Fifth Canadian Edition

Learn faster with Solution Manual For Cost Accounting: Managerial Emphasis with MyAccountingLab, Fifth Canadian Edition, a complete textbook breakdown tailored for students.

Preview 16 of 490 pages

See the first 16 pages exactly as they appear in the document.

  1. Page 1
    Read page 1 as text

    Canadian Product Corporation Limited (CPCL) is a manufacturer of small house- hold appliances. The company has only one manufacturing facility which services all of Canada. CPCL is well established and sells its products directly to department stores. CPCL wishes to begin manufacturing and marketing its newly developed cordless steam iron. In order to properly evaluate the performance of this new product, management has decided to create a new division for its production and distribution. Two of CPCL’s competitors have recently introduced their own brands of cordless steam irons at a price of $28 each. CPCL’s usual pricing strategy for new products is full absorption cost plus a 100% markup. For the new iron, at a pro- duction and sales volume of 350,000 units per year, this strategy would imply a price of $31.50. CPCL’s president, Mr. T. C. Leopard, is not sure whether this pricing strategy would be appropriate for the new iron and is considering other proposals as follows: 1. Variable product cost plus a 200% markup 2. A price of $27 to undercut the competition Mr. Leopard hired a market research firm to study the likely demand for CPCL’s cordless steam iron at the three proposed prices. The research firm con- ducted an extensive market test resulting in projected annual sales volumes over the next five years at these prices. These sales projections are summarized in Exhibit 1-1. The research firm, however, made it clear that there were no guarantees that the market would respond according to the projections. Mr. Leopard was not happy with the probabilities that the market research firm assigned to the various price/volume levels. He therefore used his own knowl- edge and past experience to assign different probabilities (see Exhibit 1-2). Mr. Leopard then called Joan Helm, the chief financial officer, to analyze the situation and recommend a five-year pricing strategy for the new cordless steam iron. As a first step, Joan assembled some relevant data which is presented in Exhibit 1-3. R EQUIRED As Joan Helm, comply with Mr. Leopard’s request. Include in your analysis considera- tion of both quantitative and qualitative factors in determining a five-year pricing strat- egy for the new iron. Case 1: Pricing (SMAC)

  2. Page 2
  3. Page 3
    Read page 3 as text

    The sales manager of Teak Plastics Limited (Teak), Naomi Moir, was concerned about the company’s record in winning bids. Teak was a small manufacturer of high- pressure injection-molded plastic parts, supplied mainly to the automotive industry. Over the past few years, Teak’s success in winning large contracts had steadily de- clined, forcing Teak to pursue greater numbers of small contracts. This has become a serious problem; the company’s total business has dropped to such an extent that it is currently operating at only 70% of capacity. Naomi realized that there was something wrong with her method of preparing bids. In the past year, Naomi found that the rate of success in winning bids increased as the total size of the contract decreased. In her attempt to increase the total amount of sales for Teak during the past year, she had submitted almost double the number of bids compared to previous years. This resulted in two people from the accounting department spending most of their time preparing the cost data for Naomi’s bids. Teak used a standard full-cost accounting system, and bids were prepared with the objective of earning a 20% markup on total costs. Standard hourly operating rates were developed using regression analysis of monthly prior-period costs for each machine and process. These costs included all labour, job setup, and mold de- velopment costs as well as fixed and variable processing overhead costs. The job setup and mold development costs were fairly constant from job to job. The coeffi- cients from the regression analysis were used as the rates for variable-cost items and Expected costs based on annual production of 350,000 units: Total variable costs $2,800,000 Total fixed overhead 2,712,500 Plant and equipment: No additional machinery or plant space will be required to produce the cordless steam iron. The plant has capacity available to produce 500,000 units per year. Inventory levels: Just-in-time inventory management will result in virtually no inventory being stored at any particular time. Selling Price Volume Probability $24.00 500,000 10% 400,000 50 300,000 40 27.00 400,000 20 350,000 40 250,000 40 31.50 300,000 40 250,000 50 200,000 10 Selling Price Volume Probability $24.00 500,000 20% 400,000 50 300,000 30 27.00 400,000 25 350,000 45 250,000 30 31.50 300,000 30 250,000 50 200,000 20 EXHIBIT 1-1 CPCL Market Research Data for Cordless Steam Iron EXHIBIT 1-3 CPCL Other Relevant Data for Cordless Steam Iron EXHIBIT 1-2 CPCL President’s Probability Data for Cordless Steam Iron Case 2: Bidding (SMAC)

  4. Page 4
    Read page 4 as text

    the intercept values were divided by full capacity processing hours to determine the rates for fixed-cost items. At a recent business luncheon seminar, Naomi had been impressed by the speaker’s model for preparing bids. This model involved using contributions, proba- bilities, and expected values. Accordingly, she decided to test the approach in preparing her next bid for a fairly small contract for instrument panel components. She started with her usual bidding method based on the cost estimate prepared by the accounting department (Exhibit 2-1), and made a mental note that she would normally have submitted a bid of $141,000. She then made her best estimates of the probabilities of winning the contract at various bids (Exhibit 2-2). Standard Standard Cost Hours Rate/Hour per Unit Processing on machine 5: Variable 500 $51.50 $ 2.575 Fixed 500 35.50 1.775 Total machine processing costs 4.350 Material 4.463 Finishing: Variable 100 23.50 0.235 Fixed 100 28.50 0.285 Total manufacturing costs before rejects 9.333 Rejects 1 0.933 Total manufacturing costs 10.266 Selling and administration 2 0.337 Total cost before royalty 10.603 Markup (20%) 2.121 12.724 Royalty of 10% of sales 3 1.414 Standard price per unit $ 14.138 Standard bid for 10,000 units 4 $141,380 1 A 10% standard allowance was added for defective units which would be rejected during final inspection. This reflected a normal spoilage rate. 2 Selling and administration costs were all treated as fixed. 3 A royalty of 10% of sales was payable to the inventor of machine 5, a very specialized machine. 4 This contract would utilize 2% of Teak’s total capacity. Probability of Bid Amount Winning Contract $136,000 95% 141,000 85 146,000 80 151,000 75 156,000 65 EXHIBIT 2-2 TEAK Probability Estimates Regarding the Potential Contract to Supply 10,000 Automobile Instrument Panel Components EXHIBIT 2-1 TEAK Cost Estimates for Contract to Supply 100,000 Automobile Instrument Panel Components

  5. Page 5
    Read page 5 as text

    R EQUIRED 1. Considering only quantitative factors, what amount should Naomi bid for the instrument panel component contract? What qualitative factors should be con- sidered before deciding on the amount of the bid? 2. Evaluate Naomi’s past method of preparing bids and explain how the rate of success in winning bids was affected by this bidding method. Discuss the appro- priateness of using probabilities and contributions for preparing bids in Teak’s current situation. 3. In order to keep up with technological advances in the industry and in the hope of improving the company’s success in winning large contracts, top management has decided to replace the existing production system with a new, completely au- tomated computerized production system. This new system will expand the total production capacity of Teak and eliminate all labour except maintenance and some handling. Fixed costs, however, will be significantly increased. Discuss the considerations in determining an appropriate pricing policy (bidding method) for Teak once the new computerized production system is in- stalled. Harry Adams is the production manager of the Zap Co. Ltd., which produces and sells a molded product called Zap. To produce this product, three raw materials are mixed in a special blender and then poured into large molds. The proportion of raw materials required may vary depending on the quality of each material. Since testing the quality of the materials requires a lengthy procedure and the use of expensive chemicals, the production supervisor uses his judgement as to the mix of the three materials to add to a blended batch. The production supervisor’s judgement has proven to be accurate 80% of the time. A single batch of blended material is enough to fill 40 molds. Each mold yields 12,000 units of Zap. After the units of Zap are re- moved from the molds, they are inspected for defects. The standard rejection rate for units of Zap produced is 2%. The standard material costs and standard input quantities for a single blended batch are as follows: The company carries raw material inventory at actual cost, but values work in process at standard cost. In order to take advantage of price decreases for inputs A and C, the produc- tion supervisor substituted more of these inputs for less of input B in the most re- cent batch. He felt the change in mix would not affect the quality or yield of Zaps produced, since this new mix was consistent with his judgement of the quality of input materials. Actual quantities and costs of materials used in the most recent batch of blended material were as follows: Of the units of Zap produced from this batch, 458,640 passed inspection and were sold for $0.50 each. The higher than normal rejection rate for this batch has caused Input Actual Quantity Actual Cost A 610 kilograms $60,000 B 1,550 kilograms 8,000 C 240 kilograms 4,200 Input Standard Cost per Standard Amount per Kilogram Blended Batch A $100 600 kilograms B 5 1,600 kilograms C 20 200 kilograms Case 3: Variance Analysis (SMAC)

  6. Page 6
    Read page 6 as text

    R EQUIRED 1. Assume that the change in raw material input mix caused the higher than normal rejection rate. Calculate the raw material production variances in as much detail as the data permit for the most recent batch of Zap, and evaluate the production supervisor’s actions with respect to this batch. 2. Assume that the company saves $1,000 of variable costs per batch (i.e., actual variable costs are $1,000 less than standard variable costs for each batch) by changing the mix of raw material inputs from the standard proportions to those proportions used in the most recent batch. The variable cost savings occur re- gardless of the batch rejection rate. Harry does not know whether the higher than standard rejection rate was a result of the change in mix of raw materials, a malfunction in the machinery, or normal random factors. He estimates that there is only a 20% chance that it was caused by the change in mix, a 70% chance that it was caused by a malfunction in the machinery, and a 10% chance that it was caused by random factors. An investigation would reveal the cause of the variation with certainty and would cost $15,000. If it is found that the cause was machinery malfunction, it would cost $10,000 to stop the production process to make repairs. (The produc- tion process will be stopped after six more batches are processed in order to ser- vice, repair, and clean the machinery; this will be done regardless of any earlier stoppage of the process or machinery repair.) If an investigation is not con- ducted, the mix of materials will not be changed for the next six batches. Should the process be investigated now, or should Harry wait until six more batches are processed? Galaxy Science Centre (GSC) is a nonprofit organization which was founded in late 20X6 as the first science museum to serve the city of Britannia. GSC’s initial con- struction and startup costs were provided by provincial and municipal government grants and private sector contributions. In return for its initial support, the provin- cial government expects GSC to operate an annual science fair that is expected to become one of the premier science fairs in the country within ten years. GSC’s board of trustees reports directly to the municipal government which provided GSC with the following mandate: (1) to educate the general public, (2) to support the science programs of local schools, (3) to provide a science resource centre for the municipality, and (4) to operate on a breakeven basis without the need for fur- ther government funding. The local university, which has been experiencing declin- ing enrollment in its science programs, especially welcomes the opening of GSC. The grand opening of GSC is scheduled for the fall of 20X8. Initially, GSC’s services will include various scientific exhibits and educational films. The annual sci- ence fair will include a contest where science projects entered by students are to be judged and the best three exhibited at GSC. Future plans include adding a gift shop featuring souvenirs of both the science centre and the city. With the grand opening quickly approaching, the board decided to hire an independent consultant to resolve the following issues: 1. Board members questioned how budgeting for operations should be applied to GSC, what performance measures are possible, and what should be considered in selecting output measures. 2. Two options are available for financing the computer and related software needed to assist in the operations of GSC—either buy or lease (see Exhibit 4- 1). The board requested a complete quantitative analysis of these two options and a recommendation. 3. Given GSC’s mandate, the only source of funding to cover the first year’s operat- ing expenses would be through admission charges and a one-time subsidy granted by the municipality. The board requested that data resulting from an initial mar- ket study and cost analysis (see Exhibit 4-2) be analyzed and an admission price Case 4: Capital Budgeting (SMAC)

  7. Page 7
    Read page 7 as text

    4. Without a subsidy from the municipality after the first year, the board won- dered whether it could continue admitting senior citizens and preschool chil- dren free of charge and still break even. Three options (see Exhibit 4-3) were put forward by the board for analysis. Analysis had indicated that GSC should obtain a model XTZ computer and related software for its operations. This equipment has an expected useful life of five years with no estimated salvage value. The two financing options identified by the board of trustees are described below. The appropriate discount rate to evaluate these options was stipulated to be 11%. Option One The XTZ computer and related software could be purchased for $40,500. Since GSC has only $20,000 available for this acquisition, the balance would be financed by a five-year bank loan at an annual interest rate of 11%. Equal annual payments would be due at the end of each year. Option Two The XTZ computer and related software could be leased from Acme Computers Ltd. The lease agreement would be for a five-year period requiring equal payments of $10,000 at the beginning of each year. EXHIBIT 4-1 GSC Computer Equipment Financing Options At the request of the municipality, GSC has agreed to admit senior citizens and preschool chil- dren free of charge during the first year of operations. To compensate GSC, the municipality reluctantly granted a one-time subsidy of $1,000,000 for GSC’s first year of operations. GSC must find an adult admission price for the first year which would be sufficient to cover operat- ing costs in excess of the subsidy. GSC would be paid full adult admission up to $6 per person by the board of education and the university for students who attend the science centre. A market study confirmed that demand for admissions to GSC would be relatively inelastic at prices at or below $6.50 per admission. The study also produced the following probability dis- tribution for total admissions (adults, students, senior citizens, and preschool children) for the first year of operations assuming an admission price of zero up to $6.50: Total Number of Admissions Probability 950,000 to 1,050,000 0.10 1,050,001 to 1,150,000 0.25 1,150,001 to 1,250,000 0.40 1,250,001 to 1,350,000 0.15 1,350,001 to 1,450,000 0.10 It was estimated that 20% of the admissions would be senior citizens and preschool children, 60% students, and 20% other adults. Initial cost analysis at various total admission volume levels resulted in the following expected total operating costs for the first year of operations (excluding the XTZ computer and related software costs by including all science fair costs): Total Number of Total Operating Admissions Costs 500,000 $6,080,000 1,000,000 6,390,000 1,500,000 6,700,000 (This analysis assumes linear cost behaviour within the relevant range.) EXHIBIT 4-2 GSC Expected Admission Levels and Operating Cost Data

  8. Page 8
    Read page 8 as text

    R EQUIRED As Edyth Plum, the independent consultant hired by GSC’s board of trustees, analyze the five issues and prepare a report, complete with recommendations, to GSC’s board of trustees. You have recently been hired as Executive Assistant to the Board of Directors of Dyna Tech Inc. The financial statements of the company for the year ended December 31, 20X5 have just been released and they are disappointing. After years of success as a “high-tech wonder company,” it appears that Dyna Tech has fallen on hard times. The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors has taken the position that the company’s financial difficulties have come about largely because of two pro- jects—the Series 3000 and Zeus. Some of the other directors are not so sure. They feel that, with some guidance from the Board, the company’s management can “work things out,” since they are essentially on the right track. The Board of Direc- tors was determined to make some decisions at their March 31, 20X6 meeting. In the meantime, they would consider two outside reports on the projects (see Exhibit 5-1 and Exhibit 5-2). The Executive Assistant would also be asked to comment at that time. The Company Dyna Tech Inc. was launched over 20 years ago in Calgary by James Cousins, an en- gineer. The company began by manufacturing touch-tone telephone converters and, later, telephone switchboards and other communications switching equipment for small and medium-sized businesses. As the company grew, more communica- tions equipment was added to round out a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) line of products directed to the same market segment. It did not take long for Dyna Tech Inc. to acquire an image as a high-technology wonder company. Sales grew from $12,000 in its first year to almost $350,000,000 ten years later. This sales success was based largely on the company’s ability to supply reliable, state-of-the-art communi- cations products to the middle portion of the market. As the company grew in size, it expanded geographically. While the head of- fice, including sales management personnel, remained in Calgary, production was shifted to facilities in Toronto and Montreal. Manufacturing was later undertaken in Britain, France, and the United States. Sales offices were located around the world as well. Over the years, the most popular Dyna Tech products have been the Series 100 and Series 200 analogue solid state switches. Dyna Tech has a worldwide installed base of over 100,000 of its PBX switches, mainly in the low to medium segment of the market. (This market segment is broadly defined as one having an installed cost of $100,000 or less per unit.) Of these switches, more than half are Series 100 or Se- ries 200 products. It has been company policy to “keep the customer happy” by sup- Three admission pricing policy options were identified as follows: 1. Admit senior citizens and preschool children free of charge and promote GSC more vigor- ously. It was estimated, for example, that a $200,000 increase in annual promotion and ad- vertising expenditures would generate a 10% increase in total number of admissions. 2. Charge a discounted admission price for senior citizens and preschool children. 3. Admit senior citizens and preschool children free of charge and convince the municipality to continue the subsidy. EXHIBIT 4-3 GSC Admission Pricing Policy for Second and Subsequent Years Case 5: linear programming (smac)

  9. Page 9
    Read page 9 as text

    changing needs of the customer. This policy has been instrumental in allowing Dyna Tech to dominate its segment of the market. Dyna Tech Inc. began as, and continues to be, a company run by engineers, for engineers. To a large extent, its success can be attributed to the technology devel- oped in its research laboratories. In fact, spending on research and development has approached 20% of sales in recent years. Much of the current research is directed to communications networks, intelligent workstations, and generally the technology necessary to make the “office of the future” a reality. The Founder The entrepreneurial spirit and drive of Dyna Tech Inc. originated with its founder. James Cousins is a brilliant engineer and salesman. It was he who insisted that the latest semiconductor technology be used in all Dyna Tech products, even the most inexpensive ones, and he spearheaded the worldwide sales effort that earned the company an Export Canada award from the government. In spite of the company’s difficulties, Mr. Cousins remains unshaken in his belief that remaining at the fore- front of technology is the path that Dyna Tech Inc. must continue to pursue. By: I.M.A. Consultant Principal Findings 1. My tests indicate that the Zeus MC is entirely compatible with the IBM PC for all commonly available software. All other functions of the Zeus MC performed within specification. 2. In my opinion, the Zeus MC can be produced equally well at either the Toronto or the Mon- treal assembly facility. 3. No additional money is available to the Zeus project, either for increased levels of R&D or for advertising. 4. The following information is related to the financial aspects of the production and sale of the Zeus MC in 20X6: a. The unit selling price to the dealer network should be $2,800. b. For internal purposes, assembly functions for the Zeus MC have been broken down into Equivalent Work Units (EWUs). c. 30 EWUs are needed to assemble one Zeus MC at the Montreal assembly facility. 20 EWUs are needed to assemble the same machine at the Toronto assembly facility. How ever, because the Toronto assembly plant is more automated, the cost of one EWU is $49.05 in Toronto while the cost of one EWU in Montreal is $8.50. d. Due to various constraints, a total of only 120,000 EWUs is available in the two locations combined. e. Target production of the Zeus MC in 20X6 is 5,000 units, 1,000 units to be produced in Montreal and 4,000 units to be produced in Toronto. It is conceivable, however, that a more desirable combination may be possible. f. The cost of material is $851 per unit in either facility. g. The Accounting Department expects to be able to recover the following costs from each Zeus MC that is sold: Zeus MC development costs $500 Faulty monitor correction costs $200 h. Overhead allocations per unit are: Variable overhead (based on estimated EWUs) $100 Fixed overhead (based on allocation formula) $350 i. Using the figures from the 20X6 production schedules, the average contribution margin per unit will be $1,113. j. For purposes of planning, it is the Total Contribution Margin (TCM) that should be maximized. EXHIBIT 5-1 DYNA TECH INC. Executive Summary of Findings re: Zeus Project

  10. Page 10
    Read page 10 as text

    By: I. C. Yu Three of the most important aspects to be considered in assessing the management control of a project are generally thought to be (1) time, (2) cost, and (3) quality. This summary will consider each in turn for the Series 3000 project. Time Series 3000: Implementation Plan and Status Report: Comments: a. Following the anticipated completion of the systems testing of hardware/software, it is now estimated that at least a further six months of preparation will be necessary before produc- tion can commence. b. As at December 31, 20X5, the systems testing of hardware/software was exactly six months behind schedule. c. As at December 31, 20X5, the testing of individual software components was only two- thirds complete. d. According to the original schedule, production of the new equipment is scheduled to begin in June 20X6. e. The Series 3000 project was first made public in June 20X4. Cost Table of Accumulated Direct Costs as at December 31, 20X5 (millions) Variance Budgeted Actual f(U) Systems Specification/Customer Liaison $ 0.50 $ 2.10 $ (1.60) Flowchart/Conceptual Development 2.75 4.15 (1.40) Software Development 5.50 18.40 (12.90) Testing of Individual Software Components (only 2/3 complete) 3.00 3.15 (0.15) Hardware Development 6.25 5.90 0.35 Bench Testing of Hardware 3.00 3.85 (0.85) Systems Testing of Hardware/Software 4.00 — 4.00 $25.00 $37.55 $(12.55) Quality Excellence in technology does not in and of itself equal quality. Other factors such as reliabil- ity, serviceability, and availability should also be considered. Plan Actual as at Dec. 31, 20X5 Month Ending Dec'x3 Mar'x4 June'x4 Sept'x4 Dec'x4 Mar'x5 June'x5 Sept'x5 Dec'x5 Mar'x6 Systems Specification/ Customer Liaison Flowchart/Conceptual Development Testing of Individual Software Components Branch Testing of Hardware Systems Testing of Hardware/Software Software Development Hardware Development EXHIBIT 5-2 DYNA TECH INC . Summary Report on Series 3000 Project

  11. Page 11
    Read page 11 as text

    The Zeus Project The impetus for the development of a microcomputer compatible with the IBM PC came from development work that had already been carried out by Dyna Tech Inc. In 20X3, the company introduced a telephone/computer workstation to work in con- junction with its Series 100 and 200 PBX products. It seemed only logical, therefore, to make the technology compatible with products being offered by the world’s largest manufacturer of computers. It would, the reasoning went, allow Dyna Tech into the mainstream of the office automation market more quickly. The particular attraction of this approach was that the microcomputer, code-named the Zeus, would be a Canadian product designed for world markets. After all, Dyna Tech already had a worldwide marketing network for its other products. In other words, the development, manufacture, and sale of the Zeus MC microcomputer would be immediately profitable while at the same time advance the relevant technology for expansion into the office automation market. The Dyna Tech Zeus MC was introduced in 20X5. With its special monitor, built-in software, communications, high-tech design, and IBM compatibility, it looked like a sure winner. Almost immediately, however, buyers began reporting that the special monitor, provided by an outside supplier, malfunctioned under sus- tained use. True to its code of customer satisfaction above all, Dyna Tech resolved the problem, but at a cost of approximately $1,000 to repair each of the more than 2,000 units that had already been sold. Actual sales of the Zeus MC in 20X5 were less than the sales forecast. Never- theless, since the monitor problems have been corrected, Dyna Tech plans to manu- facture and sell 5,000 Zeus computers in 20X6. The Series 3000 Project The Series 3000 was a personal project of James Cousins. He could see the trend toward large-scale integrated transmission and switching of voice (analogue) and computer (dig- ital) information. He also recognized that Dyna T ech Inc. had, by choice, confined itself to the low-to-medium end of the market for communications products (as defined ear- lier). And, finally, he felt a personal thrill at the prospect of having his name associated with the development of new, state-of-the-art technology that would lead the world. The result was an announcement, in June 20X4, that Dyna Tech Inc. had begun development of the integrated communications centre of the future. Using the latest digital technology, the Dyna Tech equipment would be at the centre of an all-encompassing information network, directing everything from telephone calls to the computer mainframe. The project was code-named Series 3000. The proposed installations would be expensive, probably selling for approximately $1 million per installation. Only the very largest corporations and, perhaps, governments and major universities would have use for equipment of such sophistication. James Cousins saw this as an opportunity. After all, this was the very segment of the communi- cations market in which Dyna T ech Inc. was not active. If the company was to continue its significant growth into the future, it must have products to offer in this market. Mr. Cousins recognized that competition in this market would be more intense. Dyna Tech would have to compete not only against the major computer manufactur- ers but also against all of the companies that supplied equipment to the telephone utilities throughout the world. He felt, however, that inasmuch as it was Dyna Tech that had initiated the development, the company had about two years as a “window of opportunity” between the time the Series 3000 project became common knowledge and the time the other companies became serious competition. The true extent of the competitive position of Dyna Tech would, however, not be known until all of the competing products were available and actually being sold in the marketplace. The decision was made to proceed, and a development budget of $25 million, exclusive of any capital costs, was allocated to the project. R EQUIRED Write a report for your discussion at the next board meeting, including quantitative and qualitative analyses and recommendations with respect to the two projects and the man-

  12. Page 12
    Read page 12 as text

    Riverside Mining and Manufacturing is a vertically integrated company that mines, processes, and finishes various non-precious metals and minerals. Riverside has de- centralized both on a geographical and on an operational basis. For example, Explo- ration and Development, which includes all mining operations, has been designated a strategic business unit (SBU). There are multiple divisions within this SBU, such as North American Exploration and Development, South American Exploration and Development, and other divisions. Similarly, Refining, which has often been lo- cated near the mines, is another strategic business unit and is divisionalized by geo- graphical region. Riverside has a clearly stated management control system that includes long- standing policies on transfer pricing, performance evaluation, and management compensation. Transfers are made at full cost plus a markup to approximate net re- alizable value. Riverside’s primary operating divisions (such as mining) are required to fill internal orders before servicing outside orders. Each division has full respon- sibility over setting prices and sales targets as well as monitoring costs. Also, divi- sional managers have decision-making authority over fixed investments (capital equipment) up to $0.5 million as long as the investments can be internally financed. For any investment exceeding $0.5 million, final approval must be given by the SBU and head office. For performance evaluation purposes, Riverside uses two basic measures to evaluate managers. First, it uses budgeted income, and second, return on investment (ROI). Divisional managers develop their budgets in line with goals set centrally for the organization. All budgets must be approved by the SBU and central executive before final acceptance. Net income includes headquarters’ allocations based on a percentage of divisional sales. ROI is calculated as net income divided by total as- sets. As with the budget target, the ROI target has to be approved. Although the weighted average cost of capital for the company is 12%, each division negotiates its target ROI according to past performance and perceived risks and uncertainty in the environment. Progress toward the budgeted income and ROI targets are evaluated on a quarterly basis. Riverside’s bonus compensation scheme was extended to its divisional man- agers last year. The bonus consists of a “50/50 cash plus deferred payment” scheme that is measured each quarter. For example, if a division manager exceeds budgeted income and ROI targets for the division, then the manager is awarded a bonus, 50% of which is paid immediately in cash and 50% of which is invested in “phantom shares” that can be redeemed three years hence, given continued good performance. The total value of the bonuses range from 10 to 100% of regular salary, depending on how well managers did and their level in the organization. Actual amounts of bonuses earned in any given year depend on the centrally calculated bonus pool, which is defined as a percentage of overall company income. Some of the divisional managers have been unhappy with the bonus compensa- tion scheme. They felt they were at a disadvantage because of their lack of control over their prices (due to the nature of the external market), and their inability to achieve the growth in the ROI required by central headquarters. The division man- agers believed that a shift to residual income would help, but Riverside’s CEO rejected this, feeling that residual income would not allow comparison of divisional results. The results of three of these divisions are shown in Exhibit 6-1. As well, the managers of the Primary Operating Divisions wanted the restric- tions on the internal versus external sales lifted so that they could achieve better results than they were currently experiencing. R EQUIRED 1. a. Calculate the residual income figure for each of the three divisions. b. In point form, list the advantages and disadvantages that residual income might have over the use of ROI at Riverside. 2. Evaluate the manage ment control system currently in place at Riverside, outlining its strengths and weaknesses, and make recommendations for any changes you feel Case 6: Compensation Plan (CGAC)

  13. Page 13
    Read page 13 as text

    Fence Company Ltd. (FC) was incorporated in March 20X4, and is equally owned by Robert and Morris Wood. The company constructs residential wood fences. FC’s first year was a difficult one. It is now late March 20X5, and the Wood brothers are making plans to improve FC’s performance. Having decided that they need outside advice, they asked you to meet with them. At the meeting, you asked the brothers to describe their operations and to highlight their major concerns. The following paragraphs are your notes from the meeting. ◆ FC lost business last year because it could not meet its promised installation dates during the peak period. The owners consider, however, that their biggest problem last year was caused by the need to repair fences. They guarantee their work, and they had to go back and change broken boards and clean up work sites, which cost them money and did nothing for their reputation. ◆ The owners project that FC will construct 50,000 linear metres of fence this year. To achieve this target, they think that one work team will be needed dur- ing the 12 weeks of April, October, and November, and three teams during the 20 weeks from May through September. Their projection assumes an eight- hour day and a regular five-day week. Last year they found that a good work team consisting of three people could build a 100-linear-metre fence in an eight-hour day. ◆ The average labour cost including benefits last year was $5 per hour. Labour and material costs are expected to increase 10% in 20X5. Last year there was little control over the amount of wood used on projects; the owners want to change this situation. ◆ The brothers recognize that fence building is not a year-round activity and are willing to cover any cash deficiency as long as there are prospects of prof- itability. ◆ The owners need to take out at least $15,000 each per year. In addition, they intend to hire a full-time receptionist to start on April 1 and to employ this person year-round. They expect that the salary will be about $12,000 a year but think that the cost will be worth it to ensure continuity and maintain the company’s image. ◆ A truck will have to be rented for each work team, at $500 per month. Robert Wood thinks that they should keep two of the trucks from December to March for snow removal. He and Morris could do the work and lay off everyone ex- cept the receptionist. ◆ FC will also need to rent a machine for $600 a month to dig holes. In addition, it will cost approximately $120 to move the machine from one work site to an- other. ◆ The company spent $8,000 on gas and maintenance and $1,200 on telephone Division A Division B Division C Budgeted net income $ 185 $1,964 $ 895 Actual net income $148 $1,968 $1,020 Budgeted total assets $1,310 $8,755 $6,978 Actual total assets $1,109 $8,811 $6,955 Target ROI 14.12% 22.4% 12.8% Actual ROI 13.3% 22.3% 14.7% EXHIBIT 6-1 RIVERSIDE Selected Divisional Results for the Most Recent Quarter (in thousands) Case 7: Relevant cost analysis (CICA)

  14. Page 14
    Read page 14 as text

    ◆ Morris Wood estimates that their costs last year were approximately $6 per linear metre for wood and $1 for nails and stain. ◆ The standard selling price last year was $11 per linear metre. Robert Wood thinks that they should try for $13 this year. FC’s salesperson complained last year because he could not discount the price. The brothers think that it might be a good idea to allow the salesperson to go down to $12 if forced to do so in order not to lose the sale. They are considering offering a special in April— perhaps 4% off—to get things rolling. They may also offer a 10% discount on group orders for fences for four or more houses. This discount offer worked well last year. ◆ According to the owners, a good incentive for their salesperson is crucial to in- creased sales. Last year, they paid the salesperson 5% of gross revenue for a basic one-house order for a fence of about 100 linear metres. For a two- or three-house order, they paid 6%, and for a four-house order, which is about 400 linear metres, they paid 8%. They believe that the incentive was responsi- ble for the fact that FC had a lot of two-house orders last year. ◆ Starting in April, FC will pay $2,500 a month to rent a warehouse for storing wood and equipment for the year. The landlord wants a security deposit of one month’s rent. The company also has to buy new tools that cost at least $3,000, since the work teams either stole or broke all the tools used last year. R EQUIRED Draft a report to the Wood brothers that presents your analysis of the issues and your recommendations. Berengar Ltd. is a small manufacturing company that produces a variety of products using a number of different processes in different-sized job lots. For example, some products will be ordered in lots of 10 or less, while others are produced in batches of up to 1,000 units. Berengar will modify products as required by customer order and, thus, there is little product standardization. Despite the high level of product differentiation, Berengar has, up until now, used a single factorywide overhead rate based upon direct labour-hours. The company president, J. P. Blomer, believes that this oversimplified way of applying overhead has led to the loss of several contracts for long production runs (that is, large job lots) of two of Berengar’s most popular products. Blomer has consulted with the operations staff in the machining department to see whether they have any suggestions for alternative overhead bases (other than di- rect labour-hours for their department). Because of the recent addition of five nu- merically controlled machines, the supervisor of scheduling has noticed that direct labour-hours in the department have declined considerably. The chief production engineer for machining believes that, with the new machine environment, produc- tion overhead probably varies more with machine-hours per batch and setup time than it does with the current overhead application base, direct labour-hours. Blomer asked the controller to run four regressions to assist in predicting overhead cost in the machining department. The four regressions were based on: 1. Direct labour-hours 2. Machine-hours 3. Setup hours 4. Machine-hours and setup hours One problem that the controller had to deal with was that approximately 35% of departmental overhead consisted of various lump sum monthly charges for cen- tral services such as personnel and power. The controller decided that these charges were justifiably an expense of running the machining department and left them in Case 8: regression analysis (CGAC)

  15. Page 15
    Read page 15 as text

    The results of the regressions (using the most recent 24 weeks of data) are given in Exhibit 11-1. R EQUIRED 1. F rom the results of the regression output of overhead cost with machine-hours and setup hours (Exhibit 11-1, regression 4), identify the following: a) The independent variables b) The marginal cost of an additional setup hour c) The regression equation 2. Using the information provided in Exhibit 11-1, evaluate the results of the re- gressions, using the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ). Regression 1 Regression output: overhead cost with direct labour-hours: Constant 135479.2 Std. err. of Y est. 3523.623 R 2 0.642200 No. of observations 24 Degrees of freedom 22 X coefficient(s) –28.8174 Std. err. of coeff. 4.585940 t -statistic –6.28387 Regression 2 Regression output: overhead cost with machine-hours: Constant 33310.56 Berengar Ltd. Machine Department Data for Regression Analysis (most recent 24 weeks) Overhead Cost Direct Labour-Hours Machine-Hours Set-up Hours Week 1 $72,892 2,036 379 98 2 76,451 2,125 385 101 3 75,930 2,012 378 110 4 78,591 1,900 390 112 5 77,870 1,934 401 108 6 75,420 2,095 376 110 7 73,529 1,966 365 95 8 78,210 1,924 387 103 9 85,620 1,865 464 130 10 84,322 1,912 451 110 11 89,621 1,901 496 125 12 79,739 1,864 401 101 13 81,221 1,850 425 95 14 85,130 1,812 456 102 17 87,870 1,718 485 135 18 90,565 1,741 502 129 19 89,032 1,622 491 142 20 87,979 1,639 487 110 21 86,646 1,641 479 124 22 90,772 1,628 516 99 23 85,542 1,598 472 125 24 90,159 1,597 508 160 EXHIBIT 11-1 BERENGAR

  16. Page 16
    Read page 16 as text

    R 2 0.970568 No. of observations 24 Degrees of freedom 22 X coefficient(s) 112.6582 Std. err. of coeff. 4.182588 t -statistic 26.93505 Regression 3 Regression output: overhead cost with setup hours: Constant 56802.56 Std. err. of Y est. 4524.324 R 2 0.410114 No. of observations 24 Degrees of freedom 22 X coefficient(s) 226.8502 Std. err. of coeff. 58.00416 t -statistic 3.910930 Regression 4 Regression output: overhead cost with machine-hours and setup hours: Constant 33060.920 Std. err. of Y est. 1025.838 R 2 0.971052 No. of observations 24 Degrees of freedom 21 X coefficient 110.6029 10.06200 Std. err. of coeff. 5.482857 16.98414 t -statistic 20.17249 0.592435 machine hours } setup hours {

474 more pages in the full document

Unlock it once and it stays in your library, ready to chat with or turn into flashcards.

Unlock the full document

More Accounting study materials

See all

Study this document with CramX

Once it is in your library, every tool can work from it.