CramX
RegisterLog in
Back to AI Flashcard MakerPsychology /IB Psychology HL - SCLOA - Evaluate Research On Conformity To Group Norms

IB Psychology HL - SCLOA - Evaluate Research On Conformity To Group Norms

Psychology9 CardsCreated about 2 months ago

Sherif’s (1935) autokinetic effect study showed that in ambiguous situations people tend to conform by forming group norms—initial individual estimates of light movement converged when done in groups, and even when alone afterwards participants’ estimates shifted toward the group norm.

PrintEmbedImportReport

conformity

  • tendency to change one’s thoughts, feelings, or behaviour

  • specifically in ways that agree with those of a particular individual/group/situation

Main studies:

  • Sherif (1935)

  • Asch (1951)

Tap or swipe ↕ to flip
Swipe ←→Navigate
1/9

Key Terms

Term
Definition

conformity

  • tendency to change one’s thoughts, feelings, or behaviour

  • specifically...

Sherif (1935) - process

  • participants were led to believe the study was investigating visual perception

  • Sherif (1935) - findings and conclusion

    First phase: participant estimates gradually converged to a standard estimate (personal norm)
    Second phase: in a grou...

Sherif (1935) - evaluation

Strengths:

  • sophisticated methodology with clear IV/DV to show clear cause-effec...

Asch (1951) - procedure

  • participants were to believe they were participating in study on visual perception

  • Asch (1951) - findings and conclusion

    • 76% of participants conformed at least once on a critical trial

    • only 2...

Log in to view all terms

Related Flashcard Decks

Psychology

Psychologie du Développement

Ce jeu de cartes couvre les concepts clés, l'histoire, et les méthodes de la psychologie du développement, y compris les contributions de figures influentes et les théories du développement.

10 cards
View Deck
Psychology

2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology: Psychopathology: The Cognitive Explanation

These flashcards explore how the cognitive approach explains depression as being linked to internal mental processes. They clarify that negative and irrational thoughts don’t directly cause depression but instead increase vulnerability to it, as proposed by cognitive psychologists Ellis and Beck.

50 cards
View Deck
Psychology

2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology: Psychopathology: The Behavioural, Emotional

These flashcards describe the three main categories of psychological characteristics — behavioural, cognitive, and emotional — and identify specific behavioural and cognitive symptoms of depression, such as disrupted sleep or eating patterns, poor concentration, negative thinking patterns, and black-and-white thinking.

23 cards
View Deck
Psychology

2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology: Psychopathology: The Behavioural Treatments Of Phobias

These flashcards explain behavioural methods used to treat phobias, including systematic desensitisation and flooding. They highlight how these therapies use classical conditioning principles to help individuals unlearn maladaptive responses by breaking the association between the conditioned stimulus and the fear response.

37 cards
View Deck
Psychology

2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology: Psychopathology: The Behavioural Explanation Of Phobias

These flashcards outline how the behaviourist approach explains phobias as learned behaviours. They describe the two-process model, which involves classical and operant conditioning, showing how fear responses are acquired through association and maintained through reinforcement.

30 cards
View Deck
Psychology

2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology - Research Methods: Sampling Techniques - KU

A Target Population is the large group of individuals that a researcher is interested in studying. It represents everyone who fits the criteria for the research, from which a smaller sample is usually selected for the actual study.

34 cards
View Deck

Study Tips

  • Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
  • Review cards regularly to improve retention
  • Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
  • Share this deck with friends to study together
IB Psychology HL - SCLOA - Evaluate Research On Conformity To Group Norms
TermDefinition

conformity

  • tendency to change one’s thoughts, feelings, or behaviour

  • specifically in ways that agree with those of a particular individual/group/situation

Main studies:

  • Sherif (1935)

  • Asch (1951)

Sherif (1935) - process

  • participants were led to believe the study was investigating visual perception

  • relied on autokinetic effect of light in darkness

  • were told the experimenter was going to move the light (never actually happened)

  • participants made 100 judgments on how far the light moved

  • first phase: individual

  • second phase: in groups, each participant called out estimates

  • third phase: individual again

Sherif (1935) - findings and conclusion

First phase: participant estimates gradually converged to a standard estimate (personal norm)
Second phase: in a group, participant estimates gradually converged to one group norm (social norm), and reflected influences from all group members
- participants denied that estimates were influenced by other group members (!!!)
Third phase: despite moving back to individual stage, estimates showed continued continued adherence to group norm estimate

Conclusion: social norms influence people’s judgements (perhaps on a subconscious level)

Sherif (1935) - evaluation

Strengths:

  • sophisticated methodology with clear IV/DV to show clear cause-effect (determinism)

  • influential, spurred further research into conformity

Weaknesses:

  • low ecological validity: task was artificial/ambiguous, and conformity in real life generally occurs due to subtle cues (such as media and advertising)

  • deception/no informed consent: participants were not told about the purpose of the study (but no harm, and it was necessary)

  • culturally specific: was conducted in 1935, may not be applicable in the present day as research into conformity is now well known

Asch (1951) - procedure

  • participants were to believe they were participating in study on visual perception

  • were asked to indicate which one of three comparison lines was equal in length to a standard line (repeated 18x)

  • control condition: participants performed alone

  • test condition: participants performed in a group; each participant stated their answer aloud in the presence of 6 other participants (in reality, confederates)

  • confederates gave wrong answers on 12 out of 18 trials

  • real participants were always last to answer

Asch (1951) - findings and conclusion

  • 76% of participants conformed at least once on a critical trial

  • only 24% of participants remained independent

  • when asked why they conformed, participants said it was to avoid social disapproval/criticism

Asch (1951) - evaluation

Strengths:

  • sophisticated methodology has clear IV/DV to show clear cause-effect (determinism)

  • study has been replicated many times with similar results (reliable)

  • can explain why people conform to social/cultural norms

Weaknesses:

  • should be noted that participants were acting in a way that they felt was required by the experiment

  • culturally specific: study was conducted in 1950s USA, which was very conservative at the time – standing out was not encouraged and perhaps compliance has changed from then to present day

  • sample bias: all participants were male students in 1950s USA

  • deception/no informed consent: participants were not told about the purpose of the study (but no harm, and it was necessary)

usefulness of Sherif (1937) and Asch (1951) in explaining real-life conformity

Nicholson et al. (1985):

  • participants now conform less to studies like Asch (1951)

  • may indicate that levels of conformity change over time or according to culture

Moscovici (1976):

  • traditional conformity research does not explain how the minority can influence the majority (as seen in independence movements, etc)

  • the idea that ingroup minorities exert more influence than outgroup minorities is empirically supported

evaluate

  • describe + explain

  • include background info/reasons for every point

  • give your own judgment and opinion supported by evidence

  • while discussing strengths and limitations, make clear comments about its significance, usefulness (e.g. how applicable it is, its usefulness in explaining sth), accuracy

evaluating the studies:
• discuss the extent to which the theory can be universally applied – are the explanations culturally- or gender-specific?
• evaluate strengths and limitations of methodology
• judge validity and reliability
• discuss sampling method and relate to the issue of generalisability of findings
• assess if the study has cultural, ethical, and gender considerations