Study GuideCriminal JusƟce–Prisons and Prisoners' Rights1. Prisoners’ RightsPrisoners’ rights have evolved a lot over time. Let’s explore how the law has treated inmates in theU.S. and what rights they currently have.1.1 TheHands-OffEraDuring the 19th century, American courts followed the“hands-off” doctrine. This meant judgesusually didn’t interfere with how prisons were run. Courts considered prisoners as “slaves of the state”and believed theylost their rightsbecause of their crimes.Judges avoided getting involved because they didn’t want to interfere with the executive branch’scontrol over prisons, respecting the principle ofseparation of powers.1.2 Change in the 1960s and 1970sThings started changing in the 1960s and 1970s. Courts began recognizing thatprisoners still haveconstitutional rights. Several factors caused this shift:•Black Muslim prisoners actively filed claims with the courts.•TheWarren Courtsupported protecting the rights of minorities, including those accused orconvicted of crimes.•Key legal cases made it easier for inmates to challenge prison conditions.For example:•Monroe v. Pape (1961):Citizens could sue state officials in federal court underSection 1983without exhausting state court remedies. This allowed inmates to challenge violations of theirconstitutional rights.•Robinson v. California (1962):The Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusualpunishment now applied to state prisons.Preview Mode
This document has 13 pages. Sign in to access the full document!