Legal Considerations In Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, And Special Education Policies

Preview (5 of 16 Pages)

100%

Legal Considerations In Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, And Special Education Policies - Page 1 preview image

Loading page ...

Legal Considerations in Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, and SpecialEducation PoliciesLAW ANSWERSThe most important information needed to support a possible termination is the fact thatthe teacher’s conducthas affected the studies of the students and it made a bad impact on otherteachers as well.The evidences of his unsatisfactory performance can be shown in the recordsashe has repeated his conduct without listening to the warnings given.The teacher should be givenseveral warnings and if he has not responded positively to them, then he is liable to action.The teacher can also be reprimanded for wasting the time of the students and making abad impression on the reputation of the school. The writtennotices should be issued to himbefore the final action and those notifications can be counted asa support for possibletermination.The most important reason however is the period of time he has been practicing hismisconduct which is a span of two years. All these reasons aresupportive in resulting atermination.

Legal Considerations In Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, And Special Education Policies - Page 2 preview image

Loading page ...

Legal Considerations In Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, And Special Education Policies - Page 3 preview image

Loading page ...

The grounds on which a permanent certificated employee can be dismissedare continueddismissal of the warning of the authorities. The serious matters include non compliance of theauthorities. The present case includes the long term negligence on the part of teacherfor aserious breach of disciplinarian conductof coming late in theclasses and affecting the studies ofthe students.This also has a negative impact on other employees and thus it should not betolerated.A permanent certificated employee has more credibility than the non certified one, healso has to comply with more responsibility and hence it is difficult to remove them easily aswell.This can bedeterrencein the dismissal, which in the present case accounts for the longerstay of the teacher even after conducting non disciplinarian actionscontinuously for two years.Thus, the grounds are somewhat lenient for a permanent certificated employee in California.The court asks for a continued ignorance of the warnings from the authoritiesby theteacher.The teacher should not have complied for a longer duration of time, since it is the caseof a permanent certified employee.This might be the reason that the teacher kept ignoring thewarning and noticesbecause of his permanency in the job.His continued adversities remain thehigh point in court for non compliance by the authorities.The fact that his continued misconduct has affected the students as well as teachersis aproof for his tardiness and absences.The teacher is a bad influence on a disciplined environmentof the school.The court can ignore the mistakes for a few times for a permanent certified teacher

Legal Considerations In Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, And Special Education Policies - Page 4 preview image

Loading page ...

but in the current case the non compliance was almost for two years which is a big time and itestablishes that the teacher has no intention to reform and he might not even realized his mistake.Thecriteria used by the courts to determine if a teacher is unfit to teach and should bedismissed arethe behavior he showed from the past. The number of complaints and notices ofmisconduct issued to him.The court judges the intention of the teacher to comply or defy theauthorities and the duration of non compliance.A permanent certificated teacher is not dismissedonafirst mistake rather he is given many chances to improvise.The current case is clearly ofnon complianceon the part of the teacher. He is warned andinstigated for so many times for his non disciplinarian conduct but he seem to ignore all thenotices issued against him rather he appears to have no intention of even being sorry for hisconduct as shown by his repetitive actions thus after two years of watching his actions even afterbeing a permanent certificated employee he should be dismissed and due to his unethical conductcan be considered misfit to teach.It is necessary to show that the teacher was tardy and absent for more than a number oftimesas he was in a responsibleposition, and to support his dismissal there should be sufficientreason for his termination.It is a mandatory constraint to give in writing before the court that hecontinued his actions even afterwarnings and notices and this continued for a longer period of

Legal Considerations In Education: Teacher Conduct, Student Rights, And Special Education Policies - Page 5 preview image

Loading page ...

time.The number of times the actions were repeated gives a glimpse of the intention of theteacher that he did not wanted to change.The criteria of dismissal of a permanent certified teachershould be more than justcounting the number of time she has repeated acts of tardinessand absences.It is also required tobe proved before the court thathisintention wasaffecting eth environment of the school. thestudentsweregetting affected as well as hisindisciplinewas having abad effect on otherteachers who were havinggoodbehavior.Theprocedures for dismissing a teacher in California areto produce a continued list ofmisconduct on the teacher’s part.The permanent certified teacher should have a record of poorconduct andindisciplinebehavior which can affect thefellow colleagues as well as the students.The teacher is issued many warning before the actual dismissal as the teacher shouldbe feelingalarmed on his dismissal. He should be given severe warnings so that the teacher should beprepared and responsible for the implications.When the teacher continued tocarry on with the misconduct the he should be givennotice of termination fully specifying the reasons for his dismissal.There should not be anyclaim from the teacher whichshowsthat hewas not informed about his wrong behavior. Thereisa lot of warninggiven before the actual dismissal.

Preview Mode

This document has 16 pages. Sign in to access the full document!

Report

Study Now!

Document Details

Related Documents

Needs Assessment Data Presentation

Healthcare Analytics

Professional Development Plan

Outcome Assessment 5 Project Requirements

Developmentally Appropriate Teaching Strategies

Assessment of The Nature of Cheating by Business Students at Rocky University

Debating the Impact of Item Analysis on Test Reliability and Validity

Analyzing Student Perceptions of History: The Impact of Education and Musician Status

Statistical Comparison of Reading Comprehension Test Scores: Private vs. Public School Eighth-Graders

Integrating Technology and Pedagogy: A TPACK-Based Lesson Plan for Early Literacy Development

Company

Explore

Study Tools