Q
QuestionPhilosophy

Which statement best explains Henry David Thoreau's idea of civil disobedience? A. Taxation without representation is unfair and must be resisted. B. The government must serve the people, not the other way around. C. If a law goes against morality, then citizens should protest it peacefully. D. Unjust laws must be opposed by any means necessary, including violence.
11 months agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1:
I'll solve this problem by analyzing Thoreau's concept of civil disobedience and carefully evaluating each option.

Step 2:
: Understanding Civil Disobedience

Civil disobedience, as developed by Henry David Thoreau, is a philosophical concept that advocates for peaceful, principled resistance to unjust laws or government policies. Thoreau argued that individuals have a moral responsibility to challenge laws that are fundamentally unethical, even if it means facing personal consequences.

Step 3:
: Analyzing the Options

Let's critically examine each option: A. Taxation without representation is unfair and must be resisted. - This is a historical reference to the American Revolution - While important, it does not capture Thoreau's broader philosophical concept B. The government must serve the people, not the other way around. - This is a general political principle - While related, it does not specifically address Thoreau's idea of civil disobedience C. If a law goes against morality, then citizens should protest it peacefully. - This directly aligns with Thoreau's core philosophy - Emphasizes peaceful resistance - Highlights the moral imperative to challenge unjust laws D. Unjust laws must be opposed by any means necessary, including violence. - This contradicts Thoreau's principle of non-violent resistance - Thoreau advocated for peaceful protest, not violent action

Step 4:
: Selecting the Best Answer

The most accurate representation of Thoreau's civil disobedience is option C.

Final Answer

If a law goes against morality, then citizens should protest it peacefully.