"Which idea is Hamilton challenging in Federalist No. 70? Why is energy in the executive so important? Summarize. What do you think Hamilton means by an energetic executive? Define ""feeble."" What is the result of feeble execution? The four ingredients that constitute executive energy: The two ingredients that constitute safety in a republic: Which qualities does Hamilton say are diminished when you increase the number of people holding the power of the executive? ""A feeble executive implies a feeble execution of the government."""
11 months agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1:
I'll break down Hamilton's arguments in Federalist No. 70 systematically:

Step 2:
: Hamilton's Central Challenge

Hamilton is challenging the idea of a weak, fragmented executive branch. He argues against having multiple executives or a purely legislative-controlled executive, which would diminish governmental effectiveness.

Step 3:
: Importance of Executive Energy

Executive energy is crucial because it enables: - Swift decision-making - Effective implementation of laws - National security responsiveness - Clear governmental accountability

Step 4:
: Definition of "Energetic Executive"

An "energetic executive" means: - Decisive leadership - Ability to act quickly in national emergencies - Strong, unified decision-making power - Capacity to overcome bureaucratic inertia

Step 5:
: Four Ingredients of Executive Energy

Step 6:

Unity of the executive

Step 7:

Adequate compensation

Step 8:

Permanent tenure

Step 9:

Competent powers

Step 10:
: Two Ingredients of Republican Safety

Step 11:

Responsibility of the executive

Step 12:

Constitutional limitations on executive power

Step 13:
: Qualities Diminished by Multiple Executives

- Decision-making speed - Accountability - Clarity of responsibility - Efficiency of government action

Step 14:
: Consequences of a "Feeble Execution"

A "feeble execution" results in: - Slow governmental responses - Ineffective policy implementation - Potential national vulnerability - Reduced public confidence in government

Final Answer

Hamilton argues for a strong, unified executive branch that can act decisively while remaining constitutionally constrained, rejecting fragmented leadership that would weaken governmental effectiveness.