Back to AI Flashcard MakerHistory /The causes of the American Revolution

The causes of the American Revolution

History44 CardsCreated 4 months ago

Post-1763, Britain tightened control over its American colonies due to several factors: militarily, colonial expansion westward led to Native American resistance like Pontiac’s Rebellion, requiring British troops for defence. Economically, Britain’s national debt had doubled by 1763, and politicians were frustrated by colonial reluctance to fund their own defence.

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Military

Defence of colonial boundaries against Native American attacks was increasingly important as colonies expanded westward. May 1763 Pontiac’s rebellion destroyed every British port west of Niagra. Native Americans only defeated by British soldiers. Confirmed view in London that colonies needed British troops for defence.

Tap or swipe ↕ to flip
Swipe ←→Navigate
1/44

Key Terms

Term
Definition

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Military

Defence of colonial boundaries against Native American attacks was increasingly important as colonies expanded westward. May 1763 Pontiac’s rebelli...

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Economic

British national debt had doubled between 1755 and 1763, partly caused by the 7 Years’ War. Politicians angry that colonial governments had contrib...

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Smuggling

During the Seven Years’ War it had become apparent that smuggling with Europe and West Indies was big business in America

When did Grenville become Prime Minister?

April 1763

Why did Grenville try to strengthen British control over the colonies?

To pay off national debt. Interest on national debt in 1763 was £4.4 mil and annual gov. income £8 mil. Increase taxes on America. Americans only p...

To what extent did Grenville’s western policies alienate Americans?
Proclamation line October 1763

All land claims west of Appalachians nullified. Intended to be temporary to reduce Native Am. and colonial conflict.
Angered Virginians, frontie...

Related Flashcard Decks

Study Tips

  • Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
  • Review cards regularly to improve retention
  • Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
  • Share this deck with friends to study together
TermDefinition

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Military

Defence of colonial boundaries against Native American attacks was increasingly important as colonies expanded westward. May 1763 Pontiac’s rebellion destroyed every British port west of Niagra. Native Americans only defeated by British soldiers. Confirmed view in London that colonies needed British troops for defence.

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Economic

British national debt had doubled between 1755 and 1763, partly caused by the 7 Years’ War. Politicians angry that colonial governments had contributed little to their own defence during the war.

Why did Britain try to strengthen its control over the colonies?
Smuggling

During the Seven Years’ War it had become apparent that smuggling with Europe and West Indies was big business in America

When did Grenville become Prime Minister?

April 1763

Why did Grenville try to strengthen British control over the colonies?

To pay off national debt. Interest on national debt in 1763 was £4.4 mil and annual gov. income £8 mil. Increase taxes on America. Americans only paid one shilling in taxes per year while Britons paid 26. Cost of colonial defence had risen from £70,000 I 1748 to £350,000 in 1763
More money needed to maintain 10,000 troops

To what extent did Grenville’s western policies alienate Americans?
Proclamation line October 1763

All land claims west of Appalachians nullified. Intended to be temporary to reduce Native Am. and colonial conflict.
Angered Virginians, frontiersmen and speculators.
Ignored. At least 30,000 Americans settled west of line between 1763 and ‘68.

To what extent did Grenville’s western policies alienate Americans?
Anti-smuggling measures 1763

Customs officials had to reside in colonies. Fine if custom officials take bribes.
Jurisdiction in revenue cases transferred from lenient colonial courts to a vice admiralty court. This challenged the colonial legal system.

To what extent did Grenville’s western policies alienate Americans?
1764 Sugar Act

Halved duty on Sugar. Previous Act only made £21,000 over 30 years. Stricter enforcement hoped to yield £78,000 in one year.
Affected primarily New England distillers.
Imposed duties to raise revenue with underrepresentation (only five Americans in House of Commons between 1763-83)
1765-9 9 colonial assemblies write in complaint to London. Abuse of power

To what extent did Grenville’s western policies alienate Americans?
Standing army

American Whiggism - resist arbitrary rule - standing army potential threat to liberty.


To what extent did Grenville’s western policies alienate Americans?
Public figures

John Wilkes - British Whig called king’s ministers ‘tools of despotism and corruption’. Imprisoned . American hero
James Otis 1764 The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved. No taxation without consent ‘enslaved’

Stamp Act overview

1764 Granville announces his intent to impose a Stamp duty - one year to prepare
Bill passed in February 1765 to take effect on 1 November 1765
Stamps fixed onto every printed item, but lighter tax than England, to be spent entirely on colonies and only covers 1/4 of the cost of defence.

Why was the Stamp Act more antagonistic than The Sugar Act?

The Stamp Act applied universally, antagonising the most influential colonists - lawyers, printers and tavern keepers. It was the first direct tax levied by Parliament on the colonies.


Why did the Stamp Act provoke such a violent reaction in the colonies?

When Virginian assembly adopted 5 of Patrick Henry’s resolutions it was printed in many colonial newspapers and portrayed as is Virginia had rejected the Stamp Act and would resist Britain if they tried to impose it. By end of 1765 eight other colonies had passed resolutions condemning the act and denying Parliament’s right to tax the colonies.

Why did the Stamp Act provoke such a violent reaction in the colonies?

October 1765 New York Stamp Act Congress gathered 27 delegates from 9 colonies. Sought the repeal of the Stamp Act, abolition of vice-admiralty courts and of any ‘other late acts for the restriction of American commerce’.


What were popular beliefs of taxation and government in the colonies at the time?

Only proper way to raise money in America was through Assemblies.
Notion that the Stamp Act was evidence of a conspiracy to deprive Americans of their liberties was disseminated. Fear of any government
Fear that a standing army would force oppressive laws on colonists


Why did the Stamp Act provoke such a violent reaction in the colonies?
Popular resistance

Common crowd action - common in 18th century - evolved into popular militancy.
Loyal Nine - Boston led by Sam Adams - united with North and South End gangs against supporters of Stamp Act
August 1765 effigies of Oliver and Bute hanged on Liberty Tree. Mob destroyed Oliver’s office, home and Hutchinson’s mansion

Why did the Stamp Act provoke such a violent reaction in the colonies?
Success

Stamp distributors resigned or fled in every colony. Stamp Act nullified by mob action. No governors requested standing army to deal with civil disobedience.
Sons of Liberty (elite and new men) kept political consciousness high
Appealed to the public not to buy British goods until Stamp Act was repealed. This was v effective

Why did Britain repeal the Stamp Act?

New PM July 1765 Marquis of Rockingham more cautious than Grenville
Parliament divided between those who believed colonists were whining and those merchants and manufacturers who feared boycott.
General Thomas Gage, commander-in-chief of colonies informed the PM that the Act could not be enforced without far greater military force than he possessed.
Benjamin Franklin appeared before a Commons Committee to ease fears that the colonies would never pay taxes again. He insisted that the colonies only objected to internal taxes.
The Stamp Act was repealed in March 1766 by 275 votes to 167

Historian to cite taxation as the main cause of resistance to British rule

Dr L.Tucker

Example of taxes uniting colonists against Britain

Stamp Act Congress

How much would the Stamp Act have raised?

Only £60,000 per year

How much would the Townshend Duties have raised?

£40,000 per year

Historian quote about political ideas

Eric Robson. “Political ideas, not tea or taxes” were most responsible for American opposition to British rule.


Taxation was seen as part of a wider attack on

colonists’ liberties


The Proclamation line (1763) and the Quartering Act (1765) were seen as

An abandonment of former precedents set during the period of salutary neglect.

Historian quote about American resistance to any interfering policy

If the colonists were willing to accept British acts, "a precedent would be established for making still greater inroads on liberty and property."


American fear of the Boston Tea Party (1773)

Paranoia that it was the beginning of an attempt to undercut all of the trading industries.

American conspiracy of tyranny was more important than taxation because

it misconstrued British taxes into a threat to colonial liberty, which popularised opposition.

Historian quote about salutary neglect

Christie states that "American colonists … regulated their own internal policies."

How many colonial measures were disallowed by Britain from 1691-1775?

Only 5% of 8500 colonial measures, thus creating a sense of independence and control within the colonies.

Although on the surface British governors and other officials controlled colonies …

practical power lay with the Colonial Assemblies, which decided the pay rolls of officials.

The desire for equality with British subjects can be seen in

the Virginia Resolves (1765) following the stamp act, calling for equal rights and representation in British Parliament

The perception of colonial control following a period of salutary neglect, and then sudden change in precedence, created political opposition to British rule.

The perception of colonial control following a period of salutary neglect, and then sudden change in precedence, created political opposition to British rule.

Change in policy from salutary neglect to an active policy was the main cause of opposition to British rule.

Change in policy from salutary neglect to an active policy was the main cause of opposition to British rule.

The unreasonable attitude of the American towards the British was

the consequence of inconsistent British colonial policy

American ignorance of the mercantile system's regulations

Grenville's ministry estimated that £700,000 worth of imports were smuggled into the colonies annually.

British stubborn aggression can be seen with the

Declaratory Act of March 1766, in conjunction with the repeal of the Stamp Act, which reinstated British authority over the colonies "in all cases whatsoever".

Historian agenda of colonial taxation from 1863 was to

"establish the inferiority and dependence of the colonies".

Loyalist historians who believe that the unreasonable attitude of colonial radicals caused deteriorations of relations

Hutchinson and Galloway

Salutary neglect historian

Alan Farmer 'Years of Calm'

Loss of hope in the British government owed to

their continuation of unexplained law, and reactionary position towards representation of the colonies in Parliament.

Gradually resolving relations appeared to be

"a fallacious dream." - Thomas Paine

Largest British error was to


failing to act continually either as sovereign or equal, gave the colonists no choice but to react with reasoned confusion and resentment.