Skip to content
Class Notes

Undue Influence in Contract Law Key Cases and Clas

This summary explores undue influence in contract law, distinguishing between actual and presumed influence. It analyzes leading cases, legal principles, classifications (Class 1, 2A, 2B) the requirement of manifest disadvantage in equitable claims.

Preview 3 of 8 pages

See the first 3 pages exactly as they appear in the document.

  1. Page 1
    Read page 1 as text

    Raghunath Prasad v Sarju Prasad 1 Raghunath Prasad v Sarju Prasad Issue Whether the contract between the parties is induced by undue influence? Facts: The dispute involved joint family property owners, Raghunath Prasad and his son Sarju Prasad. The latter, facing legal issues, mortgaged properties to his father, borrowing ten thousand rupees at 24% compound interest. Alleging undue influence, Sarju Prasad contended that exorbitant interest rates took advantage of his mental distress. Held ( -ve ) The Court held that the plaintiff was unable to prove that the defendant dominated his position, and the contract was induced by the undue influenced. Hence, the conditions of the three steps process are not fulfdled. Tj2£ a?¥?i i nterest rate fi’ o m date of the execution. Thus, essentially, three things/steps: 1. In a position to dominate 2. Uses that position to obtain contract 3. The burden of proving it was not undue influence falls on the one accused of it * "In a position to dominate---------" has been categorised into----------two .

  2. Page 2
    Read page 2 as text

    Polygram Records Sdn Bhd v The Search Facts The defendant had previously signed a contract with the plaintiff to have exclusive recording rights for the defendants. However, at the end of 1987, the group decided to record an album under a new company, Go- Search, a company that was incorporated by the defendants' themselves. This caused the plaintiff to take action against the defendants for breach of contract. Held The plaintiff was in a position of trust and confidence and could influence the defendants into the second contract, the claim of undue influence failed. Ratio decidendi: In cases of presumed undue influence, the defendants needed to establish manifest disadvantage or prove that the contract was unconscionable, and they could not do so. This is connected to s28 of the Contracts Act and the case of Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Aboody Legal principle: 1. relationship of trust and confidence / 2. proof of manifest disadvantage X Fl Failed UI A presumption of undue influence may arise from a relationship of trust and confidence where one party can dominate the will of another. However, this presumption is likely to fail without proof of manifest disadvantage or an unconscionable contract -------------------------------------------------------------- Case Review - Polygram Records Sdn Bhd v The Search.pdf

  3. Page 3
    Read page 3 as text

    Common law classification are: 1. Direct/Actual undue influence □ Directly influences a person 2. Presumed undue influence □ It is presumed that the person had been influenced due to the relationship □ It is rebuttable □ This appears to be reflected under s.16 □ However, there appears to be a 'new' classification of Undue Influence Undue Influence in Contract Law _________ Class 1: Actual Undue Influence □ Definition: The claimant must prove that the wrongdoer exerted undue influence to induce the transaction. □ Key elements: 1. Affirmative proof is required—mere suspicion is not enough. 2. Direct evidence of coercion, pressure, or manipulation is necessary. □ Application in PBQs: o Look for explicit actions by the wrongdoer (e.g., threats, pressure, manipulation). o Identify whether the complainant was deprived of free will. o The burden of proof is on the claimant. Class 2: Presumed Undue Influence □ Definition: The claimant only needs to show a relationship of trust and confidence, leading to a presumption of undue influence. □ Key elements: o No need to prove actual coercion. o Two subcategories: □ Class 2A (Automatic presumption) □ Class 2B (Factual presumption) Class 2A: Presumed Undue Influence (Certain Relationships)

5 more pages in the full document

Unlock it once and it stays in your library, ready to chat with or turn into flashcards.

Unlock the full document

More Civil Law study materials

See all

Study this document with CramX

Once it is in your library, every tool can work from it.