Skip to content
Past Exams

NSG6101 Medical Ethics Final Exam With Answers (56 Solved Questions)

NSG6101 Medical Ethics Final Exam With Answers improves your problem-solving abilities with past exam examples.

Preview 3 of 8 pages

See the first 3 pages exactly as they appear in the document.

  1. Page 1
    Read page 1 as text

    NSG 6101 FINAL EXAMS What does PICO stand for? P = population/patient I = intervention/exposure (new/questioning text ) C = comparison (known effective treatment ) O = outcome 4 steps to EBP 1. Ask (PICO ) 2. Acquire (find evidence ) 3. Appraise (hierarchy pyramid of evidence ) 4. Apply Hierarchy pyramid of evidence (weakest) Laboratory studies - In Vito "tube test" research Comparative animal research Expert opinion - ideas, editorials, opinion (textbook) Hierarchy pyramid of evidence (observational studies ranked) Weakest : Single case reports Case studies (more than one) Strongest ranking: OAR 1. Cohort study - follow a group of animals and unknown if sick or not. (No bias) 2. Case - control study - take sick animal and control (not sick) then gather into 3. Cross - sectional study - intervention what happened (single day) Hierarchy pyramid of evidence (strongest evidence) Strongest : Meta - analysis = find new data and summaries Systematic review = find all studies that are relevant . Collaborate everything other. Randomized control trail = experimental stud. Intervention is assigned by researcher SMART goals Specific Measurable Actionable - orientated Realistic Time - constrained Veterinary practitioner’s code of conduct Primary concern for welfare of animals maintaining professional standards to stand expected by other vet practioner, users of veterinary services, the public.

  2. Page 2
  3. Page 3
    Read page 3 as text

    Veterinary practi ti oner's code of conduct mean? Informed consent Record manage ment Confident Provide estimates Signing of documents Special interest areas Ethics 1 Your own thoughts Own view Right vs. wrong Parents views Ethics 2 Analysis of ethics Studies and arguments of ethics. How to justify topic Consequentialism Choices/act ions are morally assessed in the light of the state of affairs they bring about. Promote welfare/wellbeing Utilitarianism Weighs out the costs and benefits of situation. Greatest good with least harm. Good outweighs the bad. All about the outcome Effective altruism Not the good you can do but how much good you can do. Become a doctor and save 3000 lives or become rich and donate to save 6000 people. Deontology A choice or action is right if it conforms to a moral norm. Some choices are morally for bidden. Right is privatized over good. Principalism Emphasis on harm minimization , promoting good, required disclosure of information that fosters autonomous decision making. Normative ethics ...

5 more pages in the full document

Unlock it once and it stays in your library, ready to chat with or turn into flashcards.

Unlock the full document

More Medicine study materials

See all

Study this document with CramX

Once it is in your library, every tool can work from it.