CramX Logo
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Document preview page 1

2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 1

Document preview content for 2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions)

2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions)

Build your exam confidence with 2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers, featuring actual past papers and expert tips.

Amelia Davis
Contributor
4.7
0
12 months ago
Preview (8 of 25 Pages)
100%
Log in to unlock
Page 1 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 1 preview imageAIC 301-final examwith correct 100%answers 2024The act of leaving a dangerous article such as a gun or car with a person who the lenderknows, or should know, is likely to use it in an unreasonably risky manner is known asSelectone:A. Negligent entrustment.B. Contributory negligence.C. Negligent supervision.D. The dangerous instrumentality doctrine.-answers-A. Negligent entrustment.There was a large unmarked sinkhole on Charlotte's property, a short distance from a publicroad. One evening, a police officer chased a mugger off the road and onto Charlotte'sproperty. Both the officer and the mugger fell into the hole and were injured. Which one ofthe following best answers whether Charlotte is liable for the injuries to the police officerand/or to the mugger?Select one:A. Charlotte is not liable to either the officer or the mugger, because occupiers of land haveno duty to correct defects abutting sidewalks or streets.B. Charlotte is liable to both the officer and the mugger, because she had a duty to avoidendangering travelers with an unguarded ditch.C. Charlotte is not liable to the officer or the mugger, because they were both trespassers onher property.D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded ditch, because the officer was alicensee, but she is not liable to the tres-answers-D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the
Page 2 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 2 preview image
Page 3 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 3 preview imageunguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the trespassingmugger.Antonia was a life tenantwho occupied a house at 33 Main Street. Emil had a remainderinterest in the property and planned to occupy it after Antonia's death. Antonia obtainedproperty insurance covering the house, through Richley Insurance Co. The house wasdestroyed by fire during Antonia's life estate. Richley must pay the insurance policy proceedstoSelect one:A. Emil, under the doctrine of equitable conversion.B. Antonia, since she occupied the house at the time of the fire.C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover theentire value of the property that they insure.D. Emil, because he will ultimately own the property.-answers-C. Antonia, because lifetenants can recover the entire value of the property that they insure.Cristobal is in the process of purchasing ahome from Leah. They are in the executoryperiod. This means thatSelect one:A. Cristobal and Leah have signed the real estate sales contract, but have not yet closed.B. Cristobal has made an offer and Leah has accepted verbally.C. Cristobal and Leah have signed the real estate sales contract and have gone to closing.
Page 4 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 4 preview imageD. Cristobal has made a verbal offer, which Leah is considering.-answers-A. Cristobal andLeah have signed the real estate sales contract, but have not yet closed.Kirk contracts with Ernest for five shipments of fresh produce at a specific price per shipmentdue at the time of delivery. Kirk fails to ship the third shipment. The contract between Kirkand Ernest isSelect one:A. Void.B. Unilateral.C. Divisible.D. Entire.-answers-C.Divisible. A contract is divisible if each party's performance can bedivided into two or more parts and if it appears that the parties to the contract contemplatedseparate compensation for each installment of the performance. Failure to perform oneinstallment is not failure to perform the entire agreement. If the contract is divided into partsonly to provide periodic payments toward the full amount due upon contract completion, thecontract is an entire contract, not a divisible one. When possible, courts prefer to interpretcontracts as divisible to avoid hardships that can result from delaying payments under thecontract until full performance has been completed.Fatima owns a cafe that is open to the public. Kaito enters the cafe and orders a coffee.Kaito is a(n)Select one:A. Public invitee.
Page 5 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 5 preview imageB. Business invitee.C. Express licensee.D. Trespasser.-answers-B. Business invitee.James wants to pursue a legal claim against his neighbor, but he does not know what kind ofdispute resolution procedureis the best choice for his situation. The dispute is over arelatively small amount of money, so James does not want to spend a lot in pursuit of hisclaim. James wants to be able to present his side of the story and his witnesses before aneutral third party. James would be pleased if he and his neighbor could reach acompromise, but, ideally, James wants to be able to walk away with a binding decision.Assuming that James' neighbor will agree to participate in whatever procedure Jamessuggests, which oneof the following dispute resolution procedures is the best choice forJames?Select one:A. MediationB. NegotiationC. ArbitrationD. Litigation-answers-C. ArbitrationChloe is investigating Thomas' claim for damage to his automobile. Thomas is notcooperating with Chloe's attempts to schedule an adjuster to inspect the vehicle. ChloeshouldSelect one:
Page 6 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 6 preview imageA. Issue a unilateral waiver of rights letter.B. Issue a unilateral reservation of rights letter.C. Issue denial for failure to cooperate.D. Ask Thomas to sign a reservation of rights letter.-answers-B. Issue a unilateralreservation of rights letter.Cathy left a bracelet at a jeweler for repair and was given a receipt with the statement, "Thisestablishment is not responsible for loss or damageto any item left in its possession." Whichone of the following does the statement on the receipt represent?Select one:A. Assumption of riskB. Comparative negligenceC. A hold harmless agreementD. An exculpatory clause-answers-D. An exculpatory clauseBlithe Insurance wanted to enter the Jeweler's Block insurance market and began drafting anew Jeweler's Block policy and insurance application form. Blithe believed it was critical thatall insureds under this policy must have a silent alarm system. Because Blithe would notwant to write Jeweler's Block insurance for any customer that did not have a silent alarm,Blithe should draft its application and policy so that the customer's application statementabout whether it has a silent alarm would beSelect one:
Page 7 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 7 preview imageA. A warranty because an untrue statement would render the policy voidable, even if notmaterial.B. An incontestable clause because the insured could not dispute the truth of the statement.C. A designation because designated matters must be satisfied as a condition of coverage.D. A representation because strict compliance with representations is required.-answers-A.A warranty because an untrue statement would render the policy voidable, even if notmaterial. If the statement is a warranty, ifit is untrue, the insurer may deny coverage even ifit doesn't involve a material matter. Warranties require strict compliance but representationsonly require substantial truth.Tommy agreed to mow Heidi's lawn on Wednesday for $35. Tommy then rememberedthathe had a baseball game on Wednesday. He asked Heidi if it would be okay for his friend,Jeremy, to mow her lawn, and Heidi could just pay the $35 directly to Jeremy. Heidiexpressly released Tommy from his obligation. This agreement is known asSelect one:A. Contract reformation.B. A novation.C. An accord and satisfaction.D. Substantial performance.-answers-B. A novation.Gabriela is an insurance agent selling a property policy to Oscar. Before the policy wasissued, Gabriela assured Oscar thathe would not have to add a sprinkler system to thebuilding he was insuring. After coverage was bound, there was a fire in the building and
Page 8 of 8
2024 AIC301 Law Final Exam With Answers (50 Solved Questions) - Page 8 preview imageOscar made a claim for the damages. The insurer denied coverage citing a policy provisionthat the building be sprinklered. At trial, Gabriela's assurance that sprinklers were notneeded wasSelect one:A. Admissible because her statement created an implied waiver.B. Inadmissible because the insurer's receipt of premium created an implied waiver.C. Admissible becausethe insurer did not inspect the building before coverage.D. Inadmissible because the parole evidence rule applies.-answers-D. Inadmissiblebecause the parole evidence rule applies.Vladimir and Chin are neighbors and would like to enter into a contract to equally share inthe cost to construct a new block wall between their houses. Vladimir contacts a contractorwho provides a bid and he asks Chin to sign off on it. Chin refuses. Vladimir becomes upsetand threatens to sue Chin if he does not sign off.Reluctantly, Chin signs. Is this a voidablecontract?Select one:A. Yes, because Vladimir exercised undue influence over Chin who became fearful ofVladimir.B. Yes, because Vladimir's relationship with Chin was such that Chin was compelled to sign.C. No, because all four of the elements of an enforceable contract remain intact.D. No, because threat of a lawsuit is not considered sufficient to deprive Chin of his free will.-answers-D. No, because threat of a lawsuit is not considered sufficient to deprive Chin ofhis free will.
Preview Mode

This document has 25 pages. Sign in to access the full document!