Skip to content
Textbook Guides

Solution Manual for Principles Of Electronic Materials And Devices, 4th Edition

Gain in-depth subject knowledge with Solution Manual for Principles Of Electronic Materials And Devices, 4th Edition, a must-have textbook companion.

Preview 16 of 648 pages

See the first 16 pages exactly as they appear in the document.

  1. Page 1
    Read page 1 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 Solutions Manual to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices Fourth Edition CHAPTER 1 Safa Kasap University of Saskatchewan Canada Water molecules are polar. A water jet can be bent by bringing a charged comb near the jet. The polar molecules are attracted towards higher fields at the comb 's surface (Photo by SK)

  2. Page 2
  3. Page 3
    Read page 3 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 Fourth Edition Chapter 1 Answers to "Why?" in the text Page 31: Oxygen has an atomic mass of 16 whereas it is 14 for nitrogen. The O 2 molecule is therefore heavier than the N 2 molecule . Thus, from ) ( 3 2 1 2 2 1 kT m = v , the rms velocity of O 2 molecules is smaller than that of N 2 molecules. Page 34, footnote 11 For small extensions, the difference between the engineering and instantaneous strains due to a temperature change are the same. Historically, mechanical and civil engineers measured extension by monitoring the change in length,  L ; and the instantaneous length L was not measured. It is not trivial to measure both the instantaneous length and the extension simultaneously. However, since we know L o and measure  L , the instantons length L = L o +  L . Is the difference important? Consider a sample of length L o that extends to a final length L due to a temperature change from T o to T . Let  = ( L − L o ) / L o =  L / L o be the engineering strain. The engineering definition of strain and hence the thermal expansion coefficient is Engineering strain = T L L o   = so that thermal expansion from T o to T gives,   = T T L L o o o dT L dL   ) ( o o T T L L − =    ) ( o T T − =   (1) where  =  L / L o is the engineering strain as defined above Physics definition of strain and hence the thermal expansion coefficient is Instantaneous train = T L L   = so that thermal expansion from T o to T gives,   = T T L L o o dT L dL   ) ( ln o o T T L L − =           ( ) ) ( 1 ln o T T − = +   (2) We can expand the ln(1 +  ) term for small  , so that E quation (2) essentially becomes Equation (1) 1.1 Virial theorem The Li atom has a nucleus with a +3 e positive charge, which is surrounded by a full 1 s shell with two electrons, and a single valence electron in the outer 2 s subshell. The atomic radius of the Li atom is about 0.17 nm. Using the Virial theorem, and assuming that the valence electron sees the

  4. Page 4
    Read page 4 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 nuclear +3 e shielded by the two 1s electrons, that is , a net charge of + e , estimate the ionization energy of Li ( the energy required to free the 2 s electron ) . Compare this value with the experimental value of 5.39 eV. Suppose that the actual nuclear charge seen by the valence electron is not + e but a little higher, say +1.25 e , due to the imperfect shielding provided by the closed 1 s shell. What would be the new ionization energy? What is your conclusion? Solution First we consider the case when the outermost valence electron can see a net charge of + e . From Coulomb’s law we have the potential energy 0 0 0 0 r πε e e r πε Q Q PE 4 ) )( ( 4 2 1 − + = = m) 10 )(0.17 Fm 10 8.85 ( 4 C) 10 (1.6 9 1 12 2 19 − − − −    − =  = − 1.354  10 − 18 J or − 8.46 eV Virial theorem relates the overall energy, the average kinetic energy KE , and average potential energy PE through the relations KE PE E + = and PE KE 2 1 − = Thus using Virial theorem, the total energy is eV 46 . 8 5 . 0 2 1 −  = = PE E = − 4.23 eV The ionization energy is therefore 4.23 eV. C onsider now the second case where the electron sees +1.25 e due to imperfect shielding. Again the Coulombic PE between + e and +1.25 e will be 0 0 0 0 2 1 r 4 π e e r 4 π Q Q PE   ) )( 1.25 ( − + = = m) 10 )(0.17 Fm 10 (85 4 C) 10 (1.6 1.25 9 1 12 2 19 − − − −     − = π = − 1.692  10 − 18 J or − 10.58 eV The total energy is , eV 29 . 5 2 1 − = = PE E The ionization energy , considering imperfect shielding , is 5.29 eV . This value is in closer agreement with the experimental value. Hence the second assumption seems to be more realistic. 1.2 Virial theorem and the He atom In Example 1.1 we calculated the radius of the H - atom using the Virial theorem. First consider the He + atom, which as shown in Figure 1.7 5 a, has one electron in the K - sell orbiting the nucleus. Take the PE and the KE as zero when the electrons and the nucleus are infinitely separated. The nucleus has a charge of +2 e and there is one electron orbiting the nucleus at a radius r 2 . Using the Virial theorem show that the energy of the He + ion is

  5. Page 5
    Read page 5 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 2 2 4 2 ) 2 / 1 ( ) He ( r e E o  − = + Energy of He + ion [1.48] Now consider the He - atom shown in Figure 1.75b. There are two electrons. Each electron interacts with the nucleus (at a distance r 1 ) and the other electron (at a distance 2 r 1 ). Using the Virial theorem show that the energy of the He atom is       − = 1 2 8 7 ) 2 / 1 ( ) He ( r e E o  Energy of He atom [1.49] The first ionization energy E I 1 is defined as the energy required to remove one electron from the He atom. The second ionization energy E I 2 is the energy required to remove the second (last) electron from He + . Both are shown in Figur e 1.75 These have been measured and given as E I 1 = 2372 kJ mole − 1 and E I 2 = 5250 kJ mol − 1 . Find the radii r 1 and r 2 for He and He + . Note that the first ionization energy provides sufficient energy to take He to He + , that is, He → He + + e − absorbs 2372 kJ mol − 1 . How does your r 1 value compare with the often quoted He radius of 31 pm? Figure 1.75: (a) A classical view of a He + ion. There is one electron in the K - shell orbiting the nucleus that has a charge +2 e . (b) The He atom. There are two electrons in the K - shell. Due to their mutual repulsion, they orbit to void each other. Solution Virial theorem relates the overall energy, the average kinetic energy KE , and average potential energy PE through the relations E KE PE E PE KE KE PE E 2 1 ; 2 1 ; 2 1 ; − = = − = + = (1) Now, consider the PE of the electron in Figure 1.75a. The electron interacts with +2 e of positive charge, so that 2 2 2 4 2 4 ) 2 )( ( r e r e e PE o o   − = − = which means that the total energy (average) is 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 ) 2 / 1 ( 2 1 ) He ( r e r e PE E o o   − = − = = + (2) which is the desired result.

  6. Page 6
    Read page 6 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 Now consider Figure 1.75b. Assume that, at all times, the electrons avoid each other by staying in opposite parts of the orbit they share. They are "diagonally" opposite to each other. The PE of this system of 2 electrons one nucleus with +2 e is PE = PE of electron 1 (left) interacting with the nucleus (+2 e ), at a distance r 1 + PE of electron 2 (right) interacting with the nucleus (+2 e ), at a distance r 1 + PE of electron 1 (left) interacting with electron 2 (right) separated by 2 r 1  ) 2 ( 4 ) )( ( 4 ) 2 )( ( 4 ) 2 )( ( 1 1 1 r e e r e e r e e PE o o o    − − + − + − =  2 2 8 7 r e PE o  − = From the Virial theorem in Equation (1)       − = 1 2 8 7 ) 2 / 1 ( ) He ( r e E o  (3) We are given, E I 1 = Energy required to remove one electron from the He atom = 2372 kJ mole − 1 = 25.58 eV E I 2 = Energy required to remove the second (last) electron from He + = 5250 kJ mol − 1 = 54.41 eV The eV values were obtained by using       = A eN E E 1 ) J/mole ( ) eV ( We can now calculate the radii as follows. Starting with Equation 2 for the ionization of He + , 2 1 12 2 19 2 2 2 19 2 ) m F 10 854 . 8 ( 4 ) C 10 602 . 1 ( 4 ) He ( ) J/eV 10 602 . 1 )( eV 41 . 54 ( r r e E E E o I I − − − + −   = = = =  =   from which, r 2 = 2.65  10 − 11 or 26.5 pm The calculation of r 1 involves realizing that Equation (3) is the energy of the whole He atom, with 2 electrons. If we remove 1 electron we are left with He + whose energy is Equation (2). Thus the ) He ( ) He ( 1 + − = E E E I  2 1 2 19 8 7 ) 2 / 1 ( ) He ( ) He ( J/eV) 10 602 . 1 ( eV) 58 . 24 ( I o E r e E E −       = − =  + −   1 1 12 2 19 1 2 19 ) m F 10 854 . 8 ( 4 ) C 10 602 . 1 ( 8 7 ) 2 / 1 ( ) J/eV 10 602 . 1 ( eV) 58 . 24 eV 41 . 54 ( r r e o − − − −   =       =  +   from r 1 = 3.19  10 − 11 or 31.9 pm very close to the quoted value of 31 pm in various handbooks or internet period tables ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. 3 Atomic mass and molar fractions

  7. Page 7
    Read page 7 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 a. Consider a multicomponent alloy containing N elements. If w 1 , w 2 , ..., w N are the weight fractions of components 1,2,..., N in the alloy and M 1 , M 2 , ..., M N , are the respective atomic masses of the elements, show that the atomic fraction of the i - th component is given by N N i i i M w M w M w M w n + + + = ... / 2 2 1 1 Weight to atomic percentage b. Suppose that a substance (compound or an alloy) is composed of N elements, A, B, C, ... and that we know their atomic (or molar) fractions n A , n B n C , .... Show that the weight fractions w A , w B , w C ,....are given by ... + + + = C C B B A A A A A M n M n M n M n w ... + + + = C C B B A A B B B M n M n M n M n w Atomic to weight percentage c. Consider the semiconducting II - VI compound cadmium selenide, CdSe. Given the atomic masses of Cd and Se, find the weight fractions of Cd and Se in the compound and grams of Cd and Se needed to make 100 grams of CdSe. d. A Se - Te - P glass alloy has the composition 77 wt . % Se, 20 wt.% Te and 3 wt.% P. Given their atomic masses, what are the atomic fractions of these constituents? Solution a. Suppose that n 1 , n 2 , n 3 ,…, n i ,…, n N are the atomic fractions of the elements in the alloy, n 1 + n 2 + n 3 +… + n N = 1 Suppose that we have 1 mole of the alloy. Then it has n i moles of an atom with atomic mass M i (atomic fractions also represent molar fractions in the alloy). Suppose that we have 1 gram of the alloy. Since w i is the weight fraction of the i - th atom, w i is also the mass of i - th element in grams in the alloy. The number of moles in the alloy is then w i / M i . Thus, Number of moles of element i = w i /M i Number of moles in the whole alloy = w 1 /M 1 + w 2 / M 2 + …+ w i /M i + …+ w N /M N Molar fraction or the atomic fraction of the i - th elements is therefore, alloy in moles of numbers Total element of moles of Numebr i n i =  N N i i i M w M w M w M w n + + + = ... / 2 2 1 1 b. Suppose that we have the atomic fraction n i of an element with atomic mass M i . The mass of the element in the alloy will be the product of the atomic mass with the atomic fraction, i.e . n i M i . Mass of the alloy is therefore n A M A + n B M B + … + n N M N = M alloy By definition, t he weight fraction is, w i = mass of the element i /Mass of alloy . Therefore , ... + + + = C C B B A A A A A M n M n M n M n w

  8. Page 8
    Read page 8 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 ... + + + = C C B B A A B B B M n M n M n M n w c . The atomic mass of Cd and Se are 112.41 g mol − 1 and 78.96 g mol − 1 . Since one atom of each element is in the compound CdSe, the atomic fraction, n Cd and n Se are 0.5. The weight fraction of Cd in CdSe is therefore 1 1 1 Se Se Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd mol g 96 . 78 5 . 0 mol g 41 . 112 5 . 0 mol g 41 . 112 5 . 0 − − −  +   = + = M n M n M n w = 0.587 or 58.7% Similarly weight fraction of Se is 1 1 1 Se Se Cd Cd Se Se Se mol g 96 . 78 5 . 0 mol g 41 . 112 5 . 0 mol g 96 . 78 5 . 0 − − −  +   = + = M n M n M n w = 0.412 6 or 41. 3 % Consider 100 g of CdSe . Then the mass of Cd we need is Mass of Cd = w Cd M compound = 0.587  100 g = 58.7 g (Cd) and Mass of Se = w Se M compound = 0.41 3  100 g = 41. 3 g (Se) d. The atomic fractions of the constituents can be calculated using the relations proved above. The atomic masses of the components are M Se = 78.6 g mol − 1 , M Te = 127.6 g mol − 1 , and M P = 30.974 g mol − 1 . Applying the weight to atomic fraction conversion equation derived in part (a) we find, 1 1 1 1 P P Te Te Se Se Se Se Se mol g 974 . 30 03 . 0 mol g 6 . 127 2 . 0 mol g 6 . 78 77 . 0 mol g 6 . 78 77 . 0 / − − − − + + = + + = M w M w M w M w n  n Se = 0.794 or 79.4% 1 1 1 1 P P Te Te Se Se Te Te Te mol g 974 . 30 03 . 0 mol g 6 . 127 2 . 0 mol g 6 . 78 77 . 0 mol g 6 . 127 2 . 0 / − − − − + + = + + = M w M w M w M w n  n Te = 0.127 or 12.7 % 1 1 1 1 P P Te Te Se Se P P P mol g 974 . 30 03 . 0 mol g 6 . 127 2 . 0 mol g 6 . 78 77 . 0 mol g 974 . 30 03 . 0 / − − − − + + = + + = M w M w M w M w n  n P = 0.0785 or 7.9% 1.4 Mean atomic separation, surface concentration and density There are many instances where we only wish to use reasonable estimates for the mean separation between the host atoms in a crystal and the

  9. Page 9
    Read page 9 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 mean separation between impurities in the crystal. These can be related in a simple way to the atomic concentration of the host atoms and atomic concentration of the impurity atoms respectively. The final result does not depend on the sample geometry or volume. Sometimes we need to know the number of atoms per unit area n s on the surface of a solid given the number of atoms per unit volume in the bulk , n b . Consider a crystal of the material of interest which is a cube of side L as shown in Figure 1.76. To each atom, we can attribute a portion of the whole volume, which is a cube of side a . Thus, each atom is considered to occupy a volume of a 3 . Suppose that there are N atoms in the volume L 3 . Thus, L 3 = Na 3 . a . If n b is the bulk concentration of atoms, show that the mean separation a between the atoms is given by 3 / 1 b n a = . b . Show that the surface concentration n s of atoms is given by 3 / 2 b s n n = . c. Show that the density of the solid is given by A b N M n / at =  where M at is the atomic mass. Calculate the atomic concentration in Si from its density (2.33 g cm − 3 ) d. A silicon crystal has been doped with phosphorus. The P concentration in the crystal is 10 16 cm − 3 . P atoms substitute for Si atoms and are randomly distributed in the crystal. What is the mean separation between the P atoms? Figure 1.76 Consider a crystal that has volume L 3 . This volume is proportioned to each atom, which is a cube of side a 3 . Solution a. Consider a crystal of the material which is a cube of volume L 3 , so that each side has a length L as shown in Figure 1.7 6 . To each atom, we can attribute a portion of the whole volume . For simplicity, we take the volume proportioned to an atom to be a 3 , that is, each atom is considered to occupy a volume of a 3 . The actual or true volume of the atom does not matter. All we need to know is how much volume an atom has around it given all the atoms are identical and that adding all the atomic volumes must give the whole volume of the crystal. Suppose that there are N atoms in this crystal. Then n b = N/L 3 is the atomic concentration in the crystal, the number of atoms per unit volume , the so - called bulk concentration. Since N atoms make up the crystal , we have Na 3 = Crystal volume = L 3

  10. Page 10
    Read page 10 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 The separation  between any two atoms is a , as shown in Figure 1.7 6 . Thus, 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 / 1 3 1 1 separation Mean b b n n N L a =       =       = = (1) Equation 1 can be derived even more simply because an atom has a volume of a 3 . In this volume are is only 1 atom. So n b a 3 must be 1, which leads to Equation 1. The above idea can be extended to finding the separation between impurity atoms in a crystal. Suppose that we wish to determine the separation d between impurities , then we can again follow a similar procedure. In this case, the atoms in Figure 1.7 6 are impurities which are separated by d . We again assign a portion of the whole volume (for simplicity, a cubic volume) to each impurity. Each impurity atom therefore has a volume d 3 (because the separation between impurities is d ). Following the above arguments we would find, 3 / 1 1 impurities between separation Mean I N d = = (2) b. We wish to find the number of atoms per unit area n s on the surface of a solid given the atomic concentration n b in the bulk. Consider Figure 1.7 6 . Each atom as an area a 2 , so that within this surface area there is 1 atom. Thus Surface area of 1 atom  Surface concentration of atoms = 1 or a 2 n s = 1  3 / 2 2 1 b s n a n = = ( 3 ) Equation ( 3 ) is of course based on the simple arrangement of atoms as shown in Figure 1.75 . In reality, the surface concentration of atoms depends on the crystal plane at the surface. Equation ( 3 ), however, is a reasonable estimate for the order of magnitude for n s given n b . c. We can determine the density  from the atomic concentration n b and vice versa. The volume in Figure 1.75 has L 3 n b atoms. Thus, the density is A b A b N M n L N M n L at 3 at 3 ) ( Volume Mass = = =  ( 4 ) For Si, the atomic mas M at = 28.09 g mol − 1 , so that with  given as 2.33 g cm − 3 , ) mol g 09 . 28 ( ) mol 10 022 . 6 )( cm g 33 . 2 ( 1 1 23 3 at − − −  = = M N n A b  = 5 .00  10 22 cm −  . d . The P concentration in the crystal is 10 16 cm − 3 . P atoms substitute for Si atoms and are randomly distributed in the crystal. We can use Equation (2) 3 / 1 3 6 16 3 / 1 ) m 10 10 1 ( 1 1 impurities between separation Mean −   = = = I N d = 4.64  10 − 8 m = 46.4 nm

  11. Page 11
    Read page 11 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 1. 5 The covalent bond Consider the H 2 molecule in a simple way as two touching H atoms as depicted in Figure 1.7 7 . Does this arrangement have a lower energy than two separated H atoms? Suppose that electrons totally correlate their motions so that they move to avoid each other as in the snapshot in Figure 1 .7 7 . The radius r o of the hydrogen atom is 0.0529 nm. The electrostatic potential energy PE of two charges Q 1 and Q 2 separated by a distance r is given by Q 1 Q 2 /(4   o r ). Using the Virial Theorem as in Example 1.1 , consider the following: a . Calculate the total electrostatic potential energy ( PE ) of all the charges when they are arranged as shown in Figure 1 .7 7 . In evaluating the PE of the whole collection of charges you must consider all pairs of charges and, at the same time, avoid double counting of interactions between the same pair of charges. The total PE is the sum of the following: electron 1 interacting with the proton at a distance r o on the left, proton at r o on the right, and electron 2 at a distance 2 r o + electron 2 interacting with a proton at r o and another proton at 3 r o + two protons, separated by 2 r o , interacting with each other. Is this configuration energetically favorable? b . Given that in the isolated H - atom the PE is 2  ( − 13.6 eV), calculate the change in PE in going from two isolated H - atoms to the H 2 molecule . Using the Virial theorem, find the change in the total energy and hence the covalent bond energy. How does this compare with the experimental value of 4.51 eV? Figure 1.77 A simplified view of the covalent bond in H 2 . A snapshot at one instant. Solution a. Consider the PE of the whole arrangement of charges shown in the figure. In evaluating the PE of all the charges, we must avoid double counting of interactions between the same pair of charges. The total PE is the sum of the following: Electron 1 interacting with the proton at a distance r o on the left, with the proton at r o on the right and with electron 2 at a distance 2 r o + Electron 2 on the far left interacting with a proton at r o and another proton at 3 r o + Two protons, separated by 2 r o , interacting with each other

  12. Page 12
    Read page 12 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 PE = − e 2 4   o r o − e 2 4   o r o + e 2 4   o (2 r o ) − e 2 4   o r o − e 2 4   o 3 r o + e 2 4   o 2 r o S ubstituting and calculating , we find PE = 1.0176  10 − 17 J or - 63.52 eV The negative PE for this particular arrangement indicates that this arrangement of charges is indeed energetically favorable compared with all the charges infinitely separated ( PE is then zero). b . The potential energy of an isolated H - atom is - 2  13.6 eV or - 27.2 eV. The difference between the PE of the H 2 molecule and two isolated H - atoms is,  PE = − (63.52) eV − 2( - 27.2) eV = − 9.12eV We can wri te the last expression above as the change in the total energy . eV 56 . 4 ) eV 12 . 9 ( 2 1 2 1 − = − =  =  PE E This change in the total energy is negative. The H 2 molecule has lower energy than two H - atoms by 4.56 eV which is the bonding energy. This is very close to the experimental value of 4.51 eV. (Note: We used a r o value from quantum mechanics - so the calculation was not totally classical ! ). 1. 6 Ionic bonding and CsCl The potential energy E per Cs + - Cl − pair within the CsCl crystal depends on the interionic separation r in the same fashion as in the NaCl crystal, m o r B r M e r E + − =  4 ) ( 2 Energy per ion pair in ionic crystals [1. 4 8] where for CsCl, M = 1.763 , B = 1.192  10 − 104 J m 9 or 7.442  10 − 5 eV (nm ) 9 and m = 9. Find the equilibrium separation ( r o ) of the ions in the crystal and the ionic bonding energy, that is, the ionic cohesive energy; and compare the l atter value to the experimental value of 657 kJ mol − 1 . Given the ionization energy of Cs is 3.89 eV and the electron affinity of Cl (energy released when an electron is added) is 3.61 eV, calculate the atomic cohesive energy of the CsCl crystal as joules per mol e . Solution Bonding will occur when potential energy E ( r ) is minimum at r = r 0 corresponding to the equilibrium separation between Cs + and Cl − ions . Thus , differentiating E ( r ) and setting it equal to zero at r = r o we have 0 4 ) ( 2 =       + − =       = = o o r r m o r r r B r M e dr d dr r dE   0 4 1 2 2 =       − = + o r r m o r B m r M e 

  13. Page 13
    Read page 13 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1  0 4 1 2 2 = − + m o o o r B m r M e   1 1 2 4 −       = m o o M e mB r  (1) Thus substituting the appropriate values we have ( ) 8 1 2 19 9 104 1 12 C 10 6 . 1 763 . 1 ) m J 10 192 . 1 ( 9 ) Fm 10 8542 . 8 ( 4               = − − − −  o r  r o = 3.57  10 − 10 m or 0.357 nm . The minimum energy is the energy at r = r o , that is m o o o r B r M e E + − =  4 2 min which in terms of eV is 9 9 min ) nm ( ) nm eV ( 4 ) eV ( o o o r B r eM E + − =  (2) 9 9 4 10 1 12 19 ) nm 357 . 0 ( nm eV 10 442 . 7 ) m 10 57 . 3 )( Fm 10 8542 . 8 ( 4 ) 763 . 1 )( C 10 6 . 1 ( − − − − −  +    − =  = − 6.32 eV per ion pair , or 3.16 eV per ion. The amount of energy required to break up a CsCl crystal into Cs + and Cl − ions = 6.32 eV per pair of ions . The corresponding ionic cohesive energy is E cohesive = (6.32 eV)(1.6 02  10 − 19 J eV − 1 )(6.022  10 23 mol − 1 ) = 610 kJ mol ─1 of Cs + Cl − ion pairs or 610 kJ mol ─1 of Cs + ions and Cl − ions . (No t far out from the experimental value given the large numbers and the high index, m = 9, involved in the calculations.) The amount of energy required to remove an electron from Cl − ion = 3.61 eV. The amount of energy released when an electron is put into the Cs + ion = 3.89 eV. Bond Energy per pair of Cs - Cl atoms = 6.32 eV + 3.61 eV – 3.89 eV = 6. 04 eV Atomic cohesive energy in kJ/mol is , E cohesive = ( 6.04 eV)(1.6  10 − 19 J eV − 1 )(6.022  10 23 mol − 1 ) = 582 kJ mol ─1 of Cs or Cl atom ( i.e. per mole of Cs - Cl atom pairs) = 29 1 kJ mol ─1 of atoms ------------------------ Note s : 1. Various b ooks and articles report different values for B and m for CsCl , which obviously affect the calculated energy; r o is less affected because it requires the ( m − 1) th root of mB . Richard Christman

  14. Page 14
    Read page 14 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 ( Introduction to Solid State Physics , John Wiley and Sons , 19 88 ) in Table 5 - 1 gives , m = 10.65 and B = 3.44  10 120 , quite different than values here, which are close r to values in Alan Walton, Three Phases of Matter (2 nd Edition), Clarendon ( Oxford University ) Press, 1983 (pp. 258 - 259) . 2. The experimental value of 657 kJ mol − 1 (6.81 eV per ion pair) for the ionic cohesive energy (the ionic lattice energy) is from T. Moeller et al, Chemistry with Inorganic Qualitative Analysis, Second Edition, Academic Press, 1984) p. 413, Table 13.5 . 3. Some authors use the term molecular cohesive energy to indicate that the crystal is taken apart to molecular units e.g. Cs + Cl − , which would correspond to the ionic cohesive energy here. Further, most chemists use "energy per mole" to imply energy per mole of chemical unit s , and hence the atomic cohesive energy per mole would usually refer to energy be per Cs and Cl atom pairs. Some authors refer to the atomic cohesive energy per mole as cohesive energy per mole of atom s , independent of chemical formula. 4. Equation (1) is 1 2 4 −         = m o o r m M e B  which can be substituted into Equation (2) or [1.48] to eliminate B , that is, find the minimum energy of a pair of Cs + - Cl − ions, i.e. 1 2 2 min 4 1 4 −         + − = m o o m o r m M e r r M e E          − − = m r M e E o o 1 1 4 2 min  which is called the Born - Landé equation . 1.7 Ionic bonding and LiCl Equation 1.4 8 can be used to represent the PE of the ion pair inside the LiC crystal. LiCl has the NaCl structure with M = 1.748, m = 7.30, B = 2.34  10 − 89 J m 7.30 . Further, the ionization energy of Li (Li → Li + + e − ) is 520.2 kJ mol − 1 . The electron affinity of Cl (energy associated with Cl + e − → Cl − ) is 348.7 kJ mol − 1 (a) Calculate the equilibrium separation of ions the LiCl crystal. (b) Calculate the bonding energy per ion pair in the LiCl crystal. (c) Calculate the atomic cohesive energy of the LiCl crystal. (c) Calculate the density of LiCl. Solution Figure 1Q07 - 1 shows the crystal structure of NaCl. LiCl has the same crystal structure. (a) The minimum in energy is at 0 4 ) ( 2 =       + − =       = = o o r r m o r r r B r M e dr d dr r dE   0 4 1 2 2 =       − = + o r r m o r B m r M e 

  15. Page 15
    Read page 15 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1  0 4 1 2 2 = − + m o o o r B m r M e   1 1 2 4 −       = m o o M e mB r  Thus , substituting the appropriate values we have 8 1 2 19 30 . 7 89 1 12 C) 10 602 . 1 ( 748 . 1 ) m J 10 34 . 2 ( 30 . 7 ) Fm 10 8542 . 8 ( 4             = − − − −  o r  r o = 2.61 2  10 − 10 m or 0.261 nm . (b) The minimum energy is the energy at r = r o , that is m o o o r B r M e E + − =  4 2 min 8 . 7 10 8 . 7 89 10 1 12 2 19 ) m 10 61 . 2 ( m J 10 34 . 2 ) m 10 61 . 2 )( Fm 10 8542 . 8 ( 4 ) 748 . 1 ( ) C 10 602 . 1 ( − − − − − −   +    − =  = − 1.33  10 − 18 J per of Li + - Cl − ions = − 8.32 eV per ion pair, or − 4.18 eV per ion. The bond energy is therefore E bond = − E min = 8.3 17 eV per ion pair, or 4.18 eV per ion. (c) In (b) we calculated t he amount of energy required to break up Li + - Cl − pair into Li + and Cl − ions = 8.3 17 eV per pair of ions. The corresponding ionic cohesive energy is E ionic - c ohesive = ( 8.317 eV)(1.6 02  10 − 19 J eV − 1 )(6.022  10 − 23 mol − 1 ) = 802 kJ mol ─1 of Li + Cl − ion pairs or 802 kJ mol ─1 of Li + ions and Cl − ions. Consider the electron affinity of Cl and the ionization energy of Li, then by definition, we have E nergy required to remove an electron from Cl − ion = 348.7 kJ mol − 1 = 3.61 4 eV per ion . E nergy released when an electron is put into the Li + ion = 520.2 kJ mol − 1 = 5.392 eV per ion . Bond Energy per pair of Cs - Cl atoms = 8.317 eV + 3.61 4 eV – 5.392 eV = 6. 539 eV or 6.54 eV Atomic cohesive energy in kJ/mol is , E atomic - c ohesive = (6. 539 eV)(1.6 02  10 − 19 J eV − 1 )(6.022  10 23 mol − 1 ) = 631 kJ mol ─1 of Cs or Cl atom ( i.e. per mole of Cs - Cl atom pairs) = 315 kJ mol ─1 of atoms (d) We know the interionic separation, which is r o . The lattice parameter a is a = 2 ro = 2(2.61  1 0 − 10 m) = 5.22  10 − 10 m

  16. Page 16
    Read page 16 as text

    Solutions to Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices: 4th Edition ( 2 5 April 2017 ) Chapter 1 We can find the atomic masses of Li and Cl from Appendix C or from any periodic table. The density is given as ( ) 3 Cl Li 4 4 unitcell of Volume type this of mass Atomic cell unit in given type of atoms of Number a M M + =  =    3 10 1 23 1 3 1 23 1 3 ) 10 224 . 5 ( ) mol 10 022 . 6 ( ) mol kg 10 45 . 35 ( 4 ) mol 10 022 . 6 ( ) mol kg 10 94 . 6 ( 4 − − − − − − −    +   =  = 1,980 kg m − 3 or 1.98 g cm − 3 . Figure 1Q07 - 1 Left: A schematic illustration of a cross section from solid NaCl. Solid NaCl is made of Cl − and Na + ions arranged alternatingly, so the oppositely charged ions are closest to each other and attract each other. There are also repulsive forces between the like - ions. In equilibrium, the net force acting on any ion is zero. The interionic separation r o and the lattice parameter a are shown; clearly a = 2 r o . (b) Solid NaCl and the definition of the unit cell with a lattice parameter a . There are 4 Na + and 4 Cl − ions in the unit cell. Clearly, a = 2 r o . ------------------------ Comment s : The values for m , and B are from Richard Christman, Fundamental of Solid State Physics , Wiley and Sons (New York) , 1987, Ch 5, Table 5 - 1, p130 . Cl electron affinity from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_affinity_(data_page) and Li ionization energy from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_ionization_energies_of_the_elements (22 October 2016) We can compare the results from this calculation with some published experimental and calculated values as in table 1Q07 - 1. T he calculated values above are not too far out from experimental values. Usually m and B are determined by using experimental values for the elastic coefficients as will be apparent in Question 1.9 where elastic coefficient s are relate d to m and B ) Lattice energy of an ionic crystal is the energy of formation of the crystal from its ions. Ionic cohesive kJ mol ─1 Atomic cohesive per Li - Cl pair kJ mol ─1 Atomic cohesive energy per atom kJ mol ─1 r o (nm) a (nm)  (g cm −  ) 1Q07 (This question) 802 631 315 0.261 0.522 1.98

632 more pages in the full document

Unlock it once and it stays in your library, ready to chat with or turn into flashcards.

Unlock the full document

More Physics study materials

See all

Study this document with CramX

Once it is in your library, every tool can work from it.