CHAPTER 1CHEMISTRY: THE STUDY OF CHANGEProblem CategoriesBiological: 1.26, 1.50, 1.71, 1.72, 1.80, 1.86, 1.96, 1.97, 1.105, 1.114.Conceptual: 1.3, 1.4, 1.17, 1.18, 1.11, 1.12, 1.56, 1.64, 1.91, 1.94, 1.101, 1.103, 1.117.Environmental: 1.72, 1.89, 1.91, 1.98, 1.109, 1.112.Industrial: 1.53, 1.57, 1.83.Difficulty LevelEasy: 1.3, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, 1.17, 1.23, 1.24, 1.25, 1.26, 1.27, 1.28, 1.31, 1.32, 1.33, 1.34, 1.35, 1.36, 1.56, 1.57,1.66, 1.79, 1.82, 1.86, 1.91.Medium: 1.4, 1.18, 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, 1.40, 1.41, 1.42, 1.43, 1.44, 1.45, 1.46, 1.47, 1.48, 1.49, 1.50, 1.51, 1.52, 1.53,1.54, 1.55, 1.58, 1.59, 1.60, 1.61, 1.62, 1.63, 1.64, 1.65, 1.72, 1.73, 1.74, 1.75, 1.76, 1.77, 1.78, 1.80, 1.81, 1.83, 1.84,1.85, 1.87, 1.93, 1.96, 1.97, 1.98.Difficult: 1.67, 1.68, 1.69, 1.70, 1.71, 1.88, 1.89, 1.90, 1.92, 1.94, 1.95, 1.99, 1.100, 1.101, 1.102, 1.103, 1.104, 1.105,1.106.1.3(a)Quantitative. This statement clearly involves a measurable distance.(b)Qualitative. This is a value judgment. There is no numerical scale of measurement for artisticexcellence.(c)Qualitative. If the numerical values for the densities of ice and water were given, it would be aquantitative statement.(d)Qualitative. Another value judgment.(e)Qualitative. Even though numbers are involved, they are not the result of measurement.1.4(a)hypothesis(b)law(c)theory1.9Li, lithium; F, fluorine; P, phosphorus; Cu, copper; As, arsenic; Zn, zinc; Cl, chlorine; Pt, platinum;Mg, magnesium; U, uranium; Al, aluminum; Si, silicon; Ne, neon.1.10(a)Cs(b)Ge(c)Ga(d)Sr(e)U(f)Se(g)Ne(h)Cd1.11(a)element(b)compound(c)element(d)compoundPreview Mode
This document has 969 pages. Sign in to access the full document!
